Posted on 07/25/2021 6:47:03 AM PDT by iontheball
Video interview conducted by Michel Chossudovsky, from the Centre for Research on Globalization out of Montreal, Canada. Mr Chossudovsky interviews Ricardo Delgado Martin. Mr. Martin is the founder of La Quinta Columna in Seville, Spain, He specializes in biostatistics, clinical microbiology, clinical genetics and immunology. The video is conducted through an interpreter. As amazing as it may seem, it is the first scientific account, at least to my knowlege, of a laboratory examination and report of the contents of a vial of the so called Cov-19 'vaccine.' Here is an separate Internet link to the report. https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/06/27/la-quinta-columna-analysis-of-vaccination-vial-confirms-presence-of-graphene-nanoparticles/
(Excerpt) Read more at brighteon.com ...
Clear as day on camera, they faked it.
Enjoy being a global citizen, sounds like you’ll fit right in.
At least be enough of a decent person not to turn your neighbors in.
1. I like my DNA just the way our Creator gave it to me.
2. I think that the use of fetal growth medium is as immoral as Tophet was.
“I don’t have to trust anything. I took it. I’m fine. I’m glad I did. Course I took the pneumonia shot and the shingles shot as well.....not at the same time.”
Me, too. And I took both pf the pneumonia shots. And like you, I don’t trust anyone, either. But we also are forced live in a world of compromise to gain on anything. And whether the shots are good for you or bad, doesn’t make a lot of difference if you are trading for other things like freedoms. Those freedoms being with held by a BS government of which neither side is protecting us from each other or them. And it depends on what you can actually gain by doing so. That is the decision made by people to get the shot(s). And each person has to set their priorities.
wy69
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20216934/
“NGO is a promising new material for biological and medical applications.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26502273/
Understanding the precise mechanism of how this nanomaterial influences immune system cells allows estimating the potential influence of grapheme and GO on the human body/
https://www.materialstoday.com/carbon/news/graphene-oxide-slips-through-the-body/
The unique properties of graphene promise many novel applications, especially in biomedicine where its large surface area, high strength, and flexibility could be an boon for drug delivery or as a contrast agent for diagnostic imaging techniques like PET (positron emission tomography) scanning. One of the key properties of such agents is fast excretion from the body.
https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2019/nh/c8nh00174j#!divAbstract
In this review, we discuss antimicrobial applications of the functional carbon nanomaterials (GO and C-Dots), their antibacterial mechanisms, factors affecting antibacterial activity, and concerns regarding cytotoxicity.
There are a number of people that disagree with the other side on this. You and I are two of them. The major difference is you are on one side of the fence for disagreement of the product. I’m not. I recognize that as long as we are not going to be represented by people that are not there for our safety and prosperity, if I want to live happy, I trade.
We all die, it’s the time and place that is variable. You choose the fight it, I use it for my best lifestyle decisions to live a full live. Good luck.
Wy69
“Plus your articles fo not substantiate your claim that a COVID inoculation contains said graphene.
The discussion on the thread is not whether it is there, but what it is doing. Is it there? The consumer won’t know. But some that are qualified to say it’s dangerous are saying both ways..it is but it isn’t. But it is not my claim. It’s the scientist in Spain and many other countries that say it is. I’m just tossing the thoughts of it’s safety, or not, into a observation. Almost everything that has been invented at one point was a boom to mankind. It’s man’s misunderstanding or greed that is the question every time.
Dose per patient? That why they go to school so long to learn how to guesstimate that amount. I know a little about a number of things. And quite a bit about few. They are paid to know about this. And most likely, those paid more are trusted more or, at least, hired more. Even science isn’t an exact one.
wy69
The shot is not the mark of the beast but it is the catalyst in the greatest civil and human rights scam, sown with cruelty and malice by our own government which they have demanded upon us, we the citizens of the USA, have fallen into a bigger a more serious state of of slavery and crisis imaginable, than in a typical great milestone entry that might be noted down in our nation’s history.
It all seems easily on Parr with a Spanish inquisition.
Bulwyf wrote: “Clear as day on camera, they faked it.”
So you can analyze the contents of a syringe just by watching a video?
6 years ago I started debating Freeper pro-vaxx people because of my decision not to vaccinate our children. They were calling me a murderer of their children back in 2015. People have lost their faith in God, the medical system is the new substitute.
It is not there so discussing why it is there is pointless
“It is not there so discussing why it is there is pointless”
You seem very sure it isn’t there. But the discussion on the FR is about the possibility of it being there and that has been determined by lab and medical people in Spain. Are all the ingredients listed on the rNA on the CDC website.
Remember, these are the guys that have flipflopped on a number of occasions and not told the “whole truth” throughout this entire voyage of lies attached to C-19.
They are very pleased to use the word conclusive proof. All that means is they are not testing it to determine the validity of the drug, and so they are not certifying it.
So, I ask you the question: if they are so sure the vaccine is safe, why are they approving it for emergency use, only, and not approving it for general use? If they approved it for general use, they would be in the loop on anything it does negatively. CYA. And the only answer given about the “discovery” in Spain is the questioning of their qualification and not the question of the contents of the vaccine they tested by medical professionals. This has been a liberal tool for over a century. If you can’t disprove the comment, kill the messenger. In other words, a half truths. And if you check the MSDS for the Pfizer product, you’ll find a huge amount of no data available on it.
So we’re right back to where we started. No one can be trusted from the president down and the medical professionals(?) as they have a commitment of their profession in the works. Who do you trust when no one can seem to determine enough about the vaccine to say it is completely safe? I guess we are right back to who is lying less.
wy69
You don’t understand graphene if you think that picture of a blood smear shows it
Keep trying
“You don’t understand graphene if you think that picture of a blood smear shows it”
That’s typical. You can try to smear the person’s opinion when you’re no more up on what is being explored than I am.
I didn’t say a thing about a blood smear. I referenced the determinations and opinions of the Spanish testing labs. I didn’t say it was there....they did. And because they did, are you even more qualified to determine their test results, especially when they might, or might not, have included the full reports and testing material to what you see? And whose to say parts of it weren’t changed or left out when it was forwarded? You can’t possibly know that unless you wrote or witnesses the entire testing and determined results by the Spanish.
I’m saying I do or don’t know. I’m considering the possibilities. And since you can’t provide all the info from the results, but attack me for not having any more information than you, I have better things to do than debate someone on capabilities you assign to me that you have to possess also. Good luck
wy69
The dr from Spain was the one who offered up the picture of the blood smear. Not me. That was the presentation initially presented
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.