And what you bolded is the problem that is laid out in
Throckmorton, which is that it's the nature of fraud that it takes time to be discovered. And when it is found after an official ruling is made, and it is also found that the actors who are responsible for the fair and honest participation in the process (like Fulton County elections officials) actually manipulated the process for one party and against another, then the original ruling should have a rehearing.
Fraud has not been proven yet, but the question is what if it is proven? As they say, the Constitution is not a suicide pact. The governed will not consent to a process that allows the criminals to use their positions of authority to hide the crime for only a few weeks, and then declare that they got away with it and there is nothing that anyone can do about it now.
-PJ
The Throckmorton case involved a fraudulent land title. The very nature of that type of dispute is that it can be resolved satisfactorily years later. A presidential election is a whole different matter. There are constitutional procedures and deadlines written into the process, and the clock doesn’t stop running on the governance of the nation and the operation of the executive branch.
Look at what’s going on in Arizona. We are closer to 2022 than we are to 2020 … and we have an audit going on in ONE county in ONE state. And the audit hasn’t even been completed yet.
And let’s keep in mind that even if fraud can be proven beyond any doubt, the election in some states was carried out in a way that makes it impossible to determine which candidate was the beneficiary of the fraud.