Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

To Help You Understand Why The “Windham Audit” Was Always A Sham
Granite Grok ^ | 16 JULY 2021 | ED MOSCA

Posted on 07/17/2021 8:41:15 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

I knew from the beginning that the “Windham Audit” was a SHAM. Four letters explain why: F-I-T-N. As in First-In-The-Nation presidential-primary.

A lot of important, powerful people make a lot of money from the First-In-The-Nation presidential-primary. And so would lose a lot of money if New Hampshire lost its F-I-T-N status, which would have been a real possibility with a real audit … because everyone with a functioning brain knows, even if most will not say it, that Biden did NOT get 400,00+ legal votes in New Hampshire (an increase of approximately 400,000 over what he tallied in the primary).

Do you really think that WMUR would just sit back and let all that advertising revenue go poof? Do you really think that all the local “consultants” and “strategists” would just sit back and let all those consulting/strategizing fees go poof?

And it is not just the people who profit directly from New Hampshire’s F-I-T-N status, our 24 State Senators and 400 State Representatives get to feel important for a few months as their “coveted endorsements” are fought over. Same for Stinky Joe at the Dying Union Misleader. And for the Sun-King. And for the Secretary of State, who gets to snap a selfie with every candidate who makes the pilgrimage to his office to file. And for the local press. Do you really think they would jeopardize their time in the limelight?

The SHAM was not concocted and carried out by the Attorney General’s Office. The SHAM was not a Republican versus Democrat thing. It was the SYSTEM, the elites, the ruling class versus the rest of us.

The SHAM was obvious from the outset when the parameters of the audit were set to exclude examination of the Presidential votes. For anyone who was willing to see it.

(Excerpt) Read more at granitegrok.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 07/17/2021 8:41:15 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The Elite's Senile PuppetBoy got 40,000 more votes than the Kenyan. Let that sink in.
2020	Joe Biden	424,921	52.71	Donald Trump	365,654	45.36	 	
2016	Donald Trump 	345,790	46.46	Hillary Clinton	348,526	46.83	 	
2012	Barack Obama	369,561	51.98	Mitt Romney	329,918	46.40	 	
2008	Barack Obama	384,826	54.13	John McCain	316,534	44.52	 	
2004	George W. Bush	331,237	48.87	John Kerry	340,511	50.24	 	
2000	George W. Bush	273,559	48.07	Al Gore	        266,348	46.80	 	
1996	Bill Clinton	246,214	49.32	Bob Dole	196,532	39.37	Ross Perot	 48,390	 9.69	 	
1992	Bill Clinton	209,040	38.91	George HW Bush	202,484	37.69	Ross Perot	121,337	22.59	 	

2 posted on 07/17/2021 8:52:59 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Mitt Romney, Chuck Schumer's p*ssboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I am glad that people are following up on other states or their state elections and hopefully it will get the attention of their legislatures.

However, it is difficult enough to decipher the truth from the clickbait nonsense in AZ, PA, GA, MI, and WI. Those are the states that need to be the focus at the moment because they have the power to change the narrative.

I also think NV and VA are places we should look next. Nevada is a cesspool of SEIU rot in Clark County. I also think Virginia may surprise some people if they did a forensic audit. There were some really wild numbers at the end of their tally.


3 posted on 07/17/2021 8:54:36 AM PDT by volunbeer (Find the truth and accept it - anything else is delusional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Turnout” was up 96,000 - 14 percent.


4 posted on 07/17/2021 8:57:13 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Mitt Romney, Chuck Schumer's p*ssboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
New Hampshire population:

        population             increase  year   turnout   % of pop
1990	1,109,252		20.5%    1992   532,000    48.0 %
                                         1996   491,000    44.3 %
2000	1,235,786		11.4%    2000   540,000    43.7 %
                                         2004   672,000    54.4 %
                                         2008   702,000    54.0 %
2010	1,316,470		 6.5%    2012   700,000    53.2 %
                                         2016   695,000    52.8 %
2020	1,377,529		 4.6%    2020   791,000    57.4 %

Turnout in the 2008 election, an all-time high for excitement over the Kenyan, was only 54 %. Suddenly, in 2020, "excitement" jumped 3 whole percent points, and 90,000 votes - all while the state's population only rose 60,000 between 2010 and 2020...

5 posted on 07/17/2021 9:19:47 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Mitt Romney, Chuck Schumer's p*ssboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Even more curious, Trump got almost 20K more votes in 2020 than when he lost NH to Hillary in 2016, but the Demented One got more than 76K MORE votes than Hillary. In one of the most politically engage populations in the county, they had almost 100K more voters in 2020 than in 2016. Not likely.


6 posted on 07/17/2021 9:23:12 AM PDT by LizzieD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator; LizzieD

You both beat me to the punch on the total votes observations.

It also raises a question about 2004. Perhaps the base level fraud was built in/strengthen back then.

This pattern of “unexplained” jumps in the NH state 2020 POTUS total numbers is seen in other states and jurisdictions - there is a pattern. Down ballot statistical analysis should also be done. And why did bellweather states Ohio and Florida not follow the pattern?


7 posted on 07/17/2021 9:40:50 AM PDT by Susquehanna Patriot ( based )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LizzieD; Susquehanna Patriot
In one of the most politically engaged populations in the country, they had almost 100K more voters in 2020 than in 2016. Not likely.

I'll take "Things That The Partisan Media Machine Of The Democrat Party Is Totally Disinterested In" for $1000, Alex.

8 posted on 07/17/2021 10:27:28 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Mitt Romney, Chuck Schumer's p*ssboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Susquehanna Patriot; LizzieD
Good point about 2004.

That's when New Hampshire "became Democrat".

Examine 2008/2012 in Missouri for the opposite effect.

The "Won" from Kenyan lost Missouri in 2008 by 3,900 votes - the high water mark of Democrat Media election propaganda.

When the DNC realized they'd never capture Missouri no matter how hard they cheated, 250,000 "Democrat voters" failed to show up for the 2012 Missouri "elections".

They've lost every succeeding Missouri presidential election by more than 250,000 votes [258,644 in 2012, 523,443 in 2016 and 465,722 in 2020].

9 posted on 07/17/2021 10:36:05 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Mitt Romney, Chuck Schumer's p*ssboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LizzieD
Trump got almost 20K more votes in 2020 than when he lost NH to Hillary in 2016, but the Demented One got more than 76K MORE votes than Hillary.

Very similar to what happened in Colorado. Fraud.

10 posted on 07/17/2021 11:09:17 AM PDT by MileHi ((Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson