Posted on 07/03/2021 9:53:56 AM PDT by CheshireTheCat
...But that opened the door to other reporters questioning why she was doing “anonymous briefings” about policy announcements anyway? What would necessitate those being anonymous? Some pointed out this was really an abuse of the point of being anonymous, which is supposed to only be to protect a source from danger. But what they are saying here, under it all, is that she’s abusing the process to not go on record while feeding them things that she ultimately doesn’t want to have to be held responsible for, and that’s wrong....
Of course, neither the Democrats or most of the media had an issue with running with “anonymous sources” behind virtually every attack on President Donald Trump. It’s why the attacks were always blowing up and being proven wrong, from Russia collusion that went on for years, to the Russian bounty story. But media went with it because it fit their narrative.
Psaki wants to have it both ways – deny the anonymous sources story about Kamala Harris while being the anonymous source to media. Just one more example of how hypocritical and dishonest the Biden team is...
(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...
And she can--with her notorious circle back.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.