Posted on 06/18/2021 5:46:51 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
In an extraordinary interview last week, Dr. Peter McCullough, an American professor of Medicine and Vice Chief of Internal Medicine at Baylor University, declared that the world has been subjected to a form of bioterrorism, and that the suppression of early treatments for COVID-19—such as hydroxychloroquine— “was tightly linked to the development of a vaccine.”
Dr. McCullough made the explosive comments during a webinar on June 11, with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, a German trial lawyer, who believes the pandemic was planned, and is “a crime against humanity.”
McCullough said he believes the bioterrorism has come in two stages—the first wave being the rollout of the coronavirus, and the second, the rollout of the dangerous vaccines, which he said may already be responsible for the deaths of up to 50,000 Americans.
[SNIP]
“The first wave of the bioterrorism is a respiratory virus that spread across the world, and affected relatively few people—about one percent of many populations—but generated great fear,” McCullough explained during the Oval Media webinar with other doctors. He noted that the virus targeted “mostly the frail and the elderly, but for otherwise well people, it was much like having the common cold.”
Dr. McCullough later elaborated that he has treated many patients with the disease, written papers on it, had the disease himself, and has also seen a death in his own family due to COVID.
The doctor said he believes that fear of the virus was used very quickly to generate policies that would hugely impact human life, such as the draconian lockdowns.
“Every single thing that was done in public health in response to the pandemic made it worse,” he pointed out.
McCullough explained that early on, as a doctor treating COVID patients, he came up with an early treatment regimen for those struck with the virus, which reduced hospital stays by about 85 percent, and said he began publishing papers on what he had learned. The doctor noted that he was “met with resistance at all levels” in terms of actually treating patients and publishing his papers.
“Fortunately I had enough publication strength to publish the only two papers in the entire medical literature that teaches doctors how to treat COVID-19 patients at home to prevent hospitalization,” he said.
“What we have discovered is that the suppression of early treatment was tightly linked to the development of a vaccine, and the entire program—and in a sense, bioterrorism phase one— was rolled out, [and] was really about keeping the population in fear, and in isolation preparing them to accept the vaccine, which appears to be phase two of a bioterrorism operation.”
I dispute the number of claimed deaths.
I also dispute the claim of asymptomatic transmission. They have tried and failed to demonstrate any amount of asymptomatic transmission.
As far as WHO is concerned, it has no credibility. It is too politicized. Science takes a back seat to political agenda with that organization.
This concludes my participation in the discussion of the vaccine. I’m kind of laughing myself for even getting involved since I’ve been watching everybody else go at it hammer and tongs.
The articles I read unfortunately did not have a link to the original studies. One of the articles did mention a 2005 study that used Ferrets. Searched with the duck, but haven’t found one where all died.
I did find several that concluded ferrets were a useful animal to use for the trials-they all had a downside of some sort, and urged caution in human trials.
Bullet points from one example:
From VACCINE Available online 23 January 2005
“vaccination did not prevent SARS-CoV infection in ferrets.
In contrast, immunized ferrets (particularly those immunized with rMVA-spike) exhibited significantly stronger inflammatory responses and focal necrosis in liver tissue after SARS-CoV challenge than control animals.
Thus, our data suggest that enhanced hepatitis is linked to
vaccination with rMVA expressing SARS-CoV antigens....
...although SARS-CoV does not cause clinical disease in ferrets, our results suggest that ferret may be a useful model for evaluating the safety of the vaccination
strategy.
.... we would like to suggest that extra caution must be taken in future human trials of SARS vaccines due to the potential organ damage resulting from immunizations”
M. Czub et al. / Vaccine 23(2005) 2273–2279 2279
https://www.csus.edu/indiv/m/millerw/webpage/wk9sarsvacferrets.pdf
More ferret info in post #82.
Thank you!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.