Posted on 06/15/2021 6:51:00 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
Also, with two infections running he likely had high levels of inflammatory cytokines in his blood which made the inflammation in his organs (lungs, kidneys) worse.
Another readable covering this:
I have this twitch, but other than that I’m fine.
Thanks for highlighting the defective nature of PCR testing, and showing your hand.
No one should sacrifice their children for an experimental vaccine.
It is so wrong, too many reports about the heart condition.
What more proof do you need?
The government has no right to take away your choice of treatment.
Is this your future government health care?
A vaccine that kills no matter your age.
Is not a vaccine. It is government murder.
This covid exspearment did what it was supposed to do.
Install fear. Fear will rule. Fear is a dreadful master.
Ruining the economy through lock downs.
Turn people against each other.
Make rules for us they themselves do not follow.
The fear helped rig the election. Mail in ballots
make it easier to steal an election.
It all fell into place.
I will stick with this because it rings true
Those who give their Liberty for temporary safety,
Deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Because that is what we have done.
If you wait for this government to save you,
You will most likely parish a slave to your new master. FEAR
Big government rules it all.
The misinterpreted report is causing antivaxxergasms.
“The misinterpreted report is causing antivaxxergasms.”
**********************************************
And the sheer number of misinterpretations they’ve managed to dream up is astounding. They keep moving their “understandings” further and further from reality.
Thank you.
What in Hades are “relevant cycle thresholds”??
The author never provides a value.
Folks should read the entire abstract.
I don’t think the people doing the autopsy ruled out VITT.
Thanks Jane.
Sorry to be lazy early in the morning .
I feel the lash. LOL.
It's 15, listed in the figures/tables. This paper isn't written for layman. It's written for educated medical and research professionals. The cycle threshold is the number of amplification cycles required to detect the viral RNA. This patient tested positive at 15 cycles, a low cycle threshold indicating a large viral load. A cycle threshold of 25 will detect over 99% of clinically significant COVID infections without generating false positives. If a patient is negative at 25 cycles, but positive with more amplification cycles, the odds of an invalid positive go up. The higher the CT, the higher the likelihood of an invalid test.
“The vaccines will never “prevent” infection in any individual.”
That was included in the conclusion/summary of their study.
In this case the patient had only received the first vax before being exposed to covid. So he wouldn’t have been expected to have the highest level of protection.
What seems to have caught their attention is that his immune system recognized and tried to fight the virus after only receiving that first shot. Whether he would have survived if he had both shots is conjecture and they didn’t address it.
From the absrtact in this autopsy:
"A previously symptomless 86-year-old man received the first dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. He died 4 weeks later from acute renal and respiratory failure. Although he did not present with any COVID-19-specific symptoms, he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 before he died. Spike protein (S1) antigen-binding showed significant levels for immunoglobulin (Ig) G, while nucleocapsid IgG/IgM was not elicited."
Note carefully in that statement -
Although he did not present with any COVID-19-specific symptoms, he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 before he died. Spike protein (S1) antigen-binding showed significant levels for immunoglobulin (Ig) G, while nucleocapsid IgG/IgM was not elicited
I am not a doctor, nor am I qualified to certify any conclusions from autopsies, however I HAVE accumulated a considerable amount of common sense understanding of important differences in various Covid-19 tests.
see https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3991215/posts
Now directly to the point of this autopsy
he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 before he died. Spike protein (S1) antigen-binding showed significant levels for immunoglobulin (Ig) G
That specific test is positive precisely because he had been vaccinated. That test is actually designed to evaluate the presence of antibodies to the spike protein generated as a result of the mRNA vaccines.
while nucleocapsid IgG/IgM was not elicited
The fact that this test was negative is very simple proof that he had NOT been infected with Covid-19. (the nucleocapsid test is precisely designed to test for antibodies to the Covid-19 virus itself, and deliberately does NOT test for antibodies to the spike protein generated by the vaccine .
In my opinion, this death was probably caused by the vaccine, and was actually not related at all to natural infection from Covid-19
I suggest this is very strong evidence that this vaccine is extremely dangerous for some people.
Furthermore, serious critical review by competent scientists MUST be completed ASAP to resolve this very obvious question.
" Although he did not present with any COVID-19-specific symptoms, he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 before he died.
I believe you found another way, 'this is how it's done' and by that I mean, this is how they count 'vaccinaton' deaths as 'Covid' deaths.
The PCR test is fake and has a 97% or greater false positive rate. Early in the plandemic, likely from the implementation of PCR testing, if a person had a positive PCR test within 60 days of dying, regardless of cause, they were deemed a Covid death. A reporter asked a gov official, "What about a motorcycle accident?" and was told that would count, and was reminded that would be only a small fraction of persons in the overall Covid 'death toll.'
CDC rules also said it was appropriate to 'presume' someone died from Covid even if they were not tested. The CDC has admitted that the PCR can't distinguish among other coronaviruses (cold, flu, pneumonia) and they denied treatment to those unfortunate enough to test (FALSE) 'positive', so they, too, contributed to the Covid death count, even if they died the weeks following 'vaccination', having spiraled down from the date of injection with strokes, heart attack, clots and paralysis = "COVID".
I suspect they keep 'vaccination deaths' out of VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reports) partly by claiming those who died the day of getting 'vaccinated' are presumed to have Covid if they didn't have a false positive on file within the prior 60 days (they test the population so much with that fake test). Of course, not counted as an adverse event (vaccine harm) but contributed to the 'surge' in Covid deaths. I recall reading anedotes on the Internet before the Biden regime began purges from family members angry that their loved ones were deemed to have died of 'hidden Covid' or 'rapid onset (2 days) diabetes' etc.
But you found another way they lie-that person's autopsy was distorted to keep his reported death out of VAERS, too.
Really, HOW MANY have died of the 'vaccines' and then been used to pad Covid numbers? I've always worried about that. The variant surges are padded with vaccine deaths, too.
A whistleblower who is part of a lawsuit, said she saw approximately 45 thousand unreported (to VAERS) deaths post 'vaccine' in the government's CMS database (medicare) and that's only one of 12 systems total that are supposed to feed such information to VAERS.
A bitchute channel, WelcomeTheEagle88, has demonstrated that the CDC started throttling back its reporting of vaccine harm starting in January, but that's before vaccination really took off. He caught the CDC backloading as time went on - any new report updates were for vaccines prior to February, so the curve of received reports to VAERS in no way matched the swell of 'vaccine' administration.
WelcometheEagle88 is an ace at medical statistical analysis (insurance companies) and could show that they were withholding reports and part of his analysis indicated the death toll could potentially be immense. He was using modeling, and didn't want to make such serious claims on modeling alone, but I picked up the ratios of LIKELY actual events versus reports published in VAERS and an early projection was over 1 million deaths. Again, it's just modeling, but we're talking about the CDC here, lying and hiding every step of the way.
Thats here we are careful about smoking them all before anyone gets a chance to see what actually killed them. Not so much in Europe.thats why they are way ahead of us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.