Ping.
Best to write your state representatives and senators and let them know. A slew of these states have Republican legislatures.
Well, all this is SUPPOSED to be in the states, anyway.
The way I read the Constitution, the states can darn well do voting however they want. Once the states pick their electors, that is *it*, end of subject; if someone here in California doesn’t like how Texas picks its electors, tough, and vice versa. If some place wants to *mandate* that everyone vote, fine, if some state wants to require that only non-felon property owners can vote, that should be fine, too. Entirely up to each individual state legislature.
As much as I despise HR 1, at least it’s being voted on in the proper venues, the state legislatures. Hopefully, the HR 1 pieces/parts will go down to a crushing defeat.
Seems like overly-simplified scare-mongering to me:
Texas leads the way based upon things that were written into bills submitted in the legislative session?
It is no secret that TX has many blue enclaves. It is no secret than many attempted to commit fraud in the 2020 election.
The legislative session is over, and the best the Democrats could do was walk out to prevent the Republican’s Election Integrity Bill from being passed due to lack of quorum. This latter will pass in a special session.
The liberals’ dream items?
Not much chance.
So the state’s are going to hand over their soul and future to the Fed govt?
A Faustian deal at best.
P
Many of these bills are by Democrats in Republican dominated states and will go no where. If Democrat dominated states, they have nothing to gain since they are already blue.
Thank you so much for posting.
Bet the Ranked Choice Voting provisions are around, too...