Posted on 05/21/2021 9:37:45 AM PDT by Dr. Franklin
UPDATE 1115 EST – Judge orders ballots unsealed. Parties to appear at ballot storage location 10am May 28th. Ballots will be scanned at 600 dpi or higher. Protocol to be determined.
—————————–
In an ongoing hearing, Henry County, GA judge, the Honorable Brian J. Amero may give access to the plaintiffs (VoterGA.org, Garland Favorito, and another plaintiff) to the physical mail-in ballots in Fulton County, which could show massive election fraud in GA during the 2020 presidential election cycle, and the follow-on runoff that decided control of the U.S. Senate for the Democrat Party, leading to full control of the American government.
In the hearing, lawyers for VoterGA.org described large discrepancies (21%) between the number of ballot batches reported by the GA Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger who certified the election, and the number of ballot batches actually provided by court-ordered access in the previous April hearing in the case.
(Excerpt) Read more at creativedestructionmedia.com ...
If it’s a democrat ‘judge’ it means democrats have covered their tracks. If it’s a real judge it might get interesting.
We cannot “unelect” a sitting President
True. The Constitution provides no way to fix a fraudulent election. But awhile back some Freeper mentioned that the Supreme Court could remove both Biden and Harris. He even cited the law. Darn if I can remember what it was. But it made sense. It was something about removing falsely accredited officials.
Perhaps post 12 in this thread: https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3929406/posts
This isn't just about Trump and his election - it's about our ability as a free country to remain free. Don't YOU get that yoyo?
Anyone can think and write from basic process rudiments what you wrote but it would be incomplete if not short-sighted.
Decertifying Electors who have already voted in the EC is as you maybe meant to write not an actionable or valid claim for reversing the EC vote for 2020.
But that’s not what decertification is intended to do, it is not intended to reverse the EC.
Decertification is an endpoint act from irrefutable evidence and proof determining malfeasance, fraud and error. It can be followed by certifying the true results of 2020 elections. Decertification is a component of certifying the true results.
When the mountain of evidence and proof is attached to a state legislature’s decertification and corrective certification, then it becomes material to any court action taken to remedy an error. One fo those actions is a process known as QUO WARRANTO.
Not "we," but Congress.
The LAAP-dog press would never pressure Biden/Harris to resign, and Congress is lost to us until the current generation of octogenarians in leadership passes.
-PJ
This isn't just about Trump and his election - it's about our ability as a free country to remain free. Don't YOU get that yoyo?
There's nothing to 'look forward to' if we're living in a commie hellhole... right?
I completely understand that, and I agree with you.
That’s why I’m all in favor of performing these audits, exposing every bit of fraud that has happened, and using that backlash to secure all future elections and prevent future fraud. I want free, fair, and open elections in this country. Win or lose, I want fair elections. Which is why I want all our energy focused on that -very achievable- goal.
Time spent on fantasies about removing Joe Biden from office because of fraud in state elections is wasted.
You did, but I just ran right into it anyway. Oh well.
Red Herring.
No leader of audits and future actions against Biden is even remotely thinking to “unchoose” Electors.
That’s not the aim nor should it be. There are options in preparation that many on this thread are unaware of and that’s the purpose of the discussion, to become aware and study further.
Asking a number of long-time FReepers, if they agree that it's fanciful to think that the results will change if fraud is found? Given hints President Trump has made recently.
Quo Warranto! That’s what I was referring to in my post #22.
Thanks!
Let’s play that tape all the way out:
The Supreme Court agrees and says “Yes! Show us how you obtained that office!”
And the archivist for the US Congress produces the Electoral College ballots for the 2020 election, each bearing the name of state-certified EC electors. And the Supreme Court says “Thank you!”
The end.
Focus on fixing the conditions that allowed fraud to happen. Focusing on fantasy legal scenarios where the US Supreme Court removes a sitting US President and installs another in his stead is fruitless and takes attention away from the real work that needs to be done.
They will not undo the election. It’s not going to happen.
The Georgia Governor f*cked the entire country. Ditto their Secretary of State and the Legislature.
It was that move along with other Republicans. Why I will never vote for a Republican again. The party totally betrayed President Trump and the American people.
Many Republicans joined the radical leftists Democrats.
F*ck them!
I know life long Republicans that gave a lot of money to the Republican party. After that move in 2020 they all agreed never again. Let that SELL OUTS party fail and anther party rise up (The America First Party).
States will be joined together this year is my estimate. Lindell says by August.
—
All those people have repeatedly been wrong in their prognostications, so I’m sticking with 8 years. And then, no matter how long or short, it has to get by Pelousi and Chuck who will do everything to prevent Traitor Joe from being perp walked out the WH.
That's exactly what I DO GET.
We have a Constitution, and in order to remain free in the long run, sometimes we have to accept undesirable outcomes in the short term that result when we follow that Constitution explicitly and exactly.
If we expect we can just toss the sitting President because we "know" he committed election fraud (which DID OCCUR,) then the next time the other side can toss a sitting President because they "know" he colluded with the Russians to get elected.
If you can't see that, then I'm afraid I cannot help.
Agreed. I was just looking for the previous comment Leaning Right mentioned.
Perdue would have won his seat ourtright. Loeffler’s race was a special election with 21 other candidates, so that race would have gone to a runoff, with the R winning.
I hope they check for the tri-folds in the mail-in ballots.
You didn’t address what I said... which is interesting...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.