Skip to comments.
BREAKING: GA JUDGE ALLOWS FURTHER SCAN OF MAIL-IN BALLOT INSPECTION IN FULTON COUNTY…GROUND ZERO OF ELECTION FRAUD…CASE COULD FLIP PRESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATION
CD Media ^
| May 21, 20
| CD Media Staff
Posted on 05/21/2021 9:37:45 AM PDT by Dr. Franklin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 181-184 next last
To: Yo-Yo
Pretend you're in a court of law. Where is your proof a beyond reasonable doubt that Biden wasn't legitimately elected?So then you agree that if you prove in a court of law that Biden cheated, then the courts can overturn the election?
THAT, was my point.
To: Yo-Yo
So do I. However, if and when he does, Harris will become President, not Trump. Okay, so Biden is removed for fraud, but Harris gets to be President?
Your logic meter must be busted.
122
posted on
05/21/2021 12:46:03 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: Paco
Sorry to be negative but we're always on the losing end of these things. You're right. We should just curl up in a ball and cry ourselves to sleep.
What has become of FreeRepublic?
123
posted on
05/21/2021 12:47:51 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: FreeReign
So then you agree that if you prove in a court of law that Biden cheated, then the courts can overturn the election? No, I don't agree in the least that the courts have authority to overturn a Presidential election, once those results are certified by Congress.
But before we get to step 2, removing Biden from office for fraud, we have to prove step 1, identifying the exact fraud that occurred. You and I both know it occurred, but neither of us can prove how and to what degree it occurred.
124
posted on
05/21/2021 12:49:08 PM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: Yo-Yo
Isn't that exactly the same standard the Left tried to use on President Trump when it came to Russian Collusion? No its not. 'Russian Collusion' was based on lies and nothing.
Election fraud is based on actual, provable, verifiable facts. And what you listed CAN be proven. It just takes the effort.
What's the matter with you?
125
posted on
05/21/2021 12:50:41 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: bagster
Wouldn’t the same evidence that unseated Biden also unseat Heels Up? That leaves Nazi Pelosi as President unless the removal is delayed until the GOP takes over the House — then the GOP Speaker of the House would be President.
To: 2aProtectsTheRest
I just want to ensure that the focus remains on productive tasks within our actual control. Do you believe that 'we' have actual control of anything?
How cute.
127
posted on
05/21/2021 12:52:34 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: 2aProtectsTheRest
What do you think Americans will do when we “expose the fraud”? Will we allow Joe the Plagiarist to keep writing executive orders? Your use of “expose the fraud” sounds like a soft-pedal euphemism for “a bloodless coup”. I am of the belief that if Biden completes 4 years we won’t ever see a fair election again. These are drastic times.
To: bagster
Et tu, Bagster?
I'm sorry, but as much as I would like to, I cannot ignore the Constitution to gain an outcome I want, without expecting the other side to do likewise.
As I've said to others, the Constitution is clear on who has the authority to remove a sitting President, and it isn't the Courts.
129
posted on
05/21/2021 12:53:29 PM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: HandyDandy
Really, man. I am embarrassed by the wimpery displayed on this thread by FReepers. Why, I might even suspect that some are fellow travelers! I know of one that is, for sure.
Just cross reference some of the names with the vaxxer jihadists.
#PushingTheDerpStateLine
130
posted on
05/21/2021 12:54:50 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: 2aProtectsTheRest
There is no legal avenue to addressing fraud in the 2020 election so wasting time on it doesn’t help us. It helps liberals who want to beat us, but it doesn’t help us. "Go back to sleep, conservatives. We'll get 'em next time".
~ 2aProtectsTheRest
131
posted on
05/21/2021 12:57:16 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: Yo-Yo
But before we get to step 2, removing Biden from office for fraud, we have to prove step 1, identifying the exact fraud that occurred. You and I both know it occurred, but neither of us can prove how and to what degree it occurred.Of course. About that, we agree.
No, I don't agree in the least that the courts have authority to overturn a Presidential election, once those results are certified by Congress.
I disagree. If it is determined in a court of law that the certification was based on fraud, then the imposter president isn't president, and the Impeachment and Removal clause shouldn't apply.
To: bagster
"So do I. However, if and when he does, Harris will become President, not Trump." Okay, so Biden is removed for fraud, but Harris gets to be President?
Your logic meter must be busted.
I'm using my Constitution meter, and it says if the President is removed from office or resigns, the Vice President assumes the Presidency.
If you're expecting the election to be nullified outright, Biden and Harris removed from office by the Supreme Court, and the election handed to Trump, then it is your logic meter that is on the fritz.
There is no authority given to the Supreme Court by the Constitution for such actions.
133
posted on
05/21/2021 12:57:40 PM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: LilFarmer
To: 2aProtectsTheRest
Well then you run right out there and fix it. You and Q; go solve that one together. ...and Q+.
Workin' on it.
Job one is facing down deep state embeds like YOU (I know my role).
135
posted on
05/21/2021 12:59:22 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: lepton
It would still fall to the VP...
To: 2aProtectsTheRest
More than just fixing the election process, the audit results must be used in criminal prosecutions to the fullest extent of the law (including potential treason for stealing the Presidency from the rightful winner) for any of it to matter as a future deterrent.
-PJ
137
posted on
05/21/2021 1:01:19 PM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(* LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
To: Yo-Yo
You and I both know it occurred, but neither of us can prove how and to what degree it occurred. Right. You and I can't. But SOMEBODY can. The evidence is vast and accessible.
All it takes is will.
138
posted on
05/21/2021 1:02:09 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: WashingtonSource
Wouldn’t the same evidence that unseated Biden also unseat Heels Up? That leaves Nazi Pelosi as President unless the removal is delayed until the GOP takes over the House — then the GOP Speaker of the House would be President. I would think if it is shown that Trump won the election, that he would be seated.
Nancy Pelosi didn't get any votes for President.
139
posted on
05/21/2021 1:03:37 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: Yo-Yo
YY: “but neither of us can prove how and to what degree it occurred.“
I can help a little there. Think of how many other dems were put in office by Dominion other than just the presidency
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 181-184 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson