Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Even NYT Hits CDC for Overstating Chances of COVID Transmission Outdoors by Potentially 10,000%
The Western Journal - Commentary ^ | Tuesday, May 11, 2021 | Grant Atkinson

Posted on 05/11/2021 3:53:57 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

“Follow the science” has become a Democratic refrain during the coronavirus pandemic. But the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — presumably the purveyor of the “science” we’ve heard so much about — has continually misled Americans and manufactured unnecessary fear.

The latest example of the CDC’s dishonesty comes from The New York Times — yes, The Times — which reported that the CDC may be overstating the risk of outdoor COVID-19 transmission by as much as 100 times.

The CDC claims that outdoor transmission of the virus accounts for “less than 10 percent” of all transmission, according to The Times. While this is technically true, it is also quite misleading.

“In truth, the share of transmission that has occurred outdoors seems to be below 1 percent and may be below 0.1 percent,” The Times reported.

If there is indeed a 0.1 percent share of outdoor transmission, that would make the CDC’s figure a 10,000 percent exaggeration.

That hasn’t stopped the CDC from effectively lying about the need for masks outdoors. It still insists that unvaccinated people and even vaccinated people need to wear masks outside in certain situations.

“The CDC says that unvaccinated people should wear masks in most outdoor settings and vaccinated people should wear them at ‘large public venues,'” The Times reported.

These recommendations are not in any way based on science.

The CDC is clearly not concerned about vaccinated people getting the virus from others. Its own guidelines say that fully vaccinated people who come into contact with an infected p

(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournal.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 05/11/2021 3:53:57 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Over a 10,000% exaggeration? Hey, why quibble over a minor mistake like that. They meant well. /sarc


2 posted on 05/11/2021 3:57:39 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

CDC went all out in the eighties to portray the AIDS/HIV as threatening to breakout into the heterosexual community in an effort to scare Congress into increasing CDC/NIH funding.


3 posted on 05/11/2021 4:06:14 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

CDC (and allied agencies) staffers who recommend that Americans wear a mask should be required to wear 10,000% more masks than they recommend for others. ;-)


4 posted on 05/11/2021 4:11:51 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Them there decimal points are a symbol of white supremacy.


5 posted on 05/11/2021 4:28:54 PM PDT by dynachrome ("I will not be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
" In truth, the share of transmission that has occurred outdoors seems to be below 1 percent and may be below 0.1 percent, multiple epidemiologists told me. The rare outdoor transmission that has happened almost all seems to have involved crowded places or close conversation.

Saying that less than 10 percent of Covid transmission occurs outdoors is akin to saying that sharks attack fewer than 20,000 swimmers a year. (The actual worldwide number is around 150.) It’s both true and deceiving."

In addition is the aspect of low viral load. With the wind as strong as it was today and often here in MA, then the chance of catching Covid is even less, and resulting in a serious case is virtually nill.

6 posted on 05/11/2021 5:18:23 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save + be baptized + follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

“CDC went all out in the eighties to portray the AIDS/HIV as threatening to breakout into the heterosexual community in an effort to scare Congress into increasing CDC/NIH funding.”

Also to keep it from being tagged “gay plague.”

(Although I disapprove of the use of the euphemism “gay” to describe sodomites, with all the evils that entails.)


7 posted on 05/11/2021 5:19:54 PM PDT by dsc (Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
Over a 10,000% exaggeration? Hey, why quibble over a minor mistake like that. They meant well. /sarc

They're totally lying about the covid but they're totally telling the truth about the vax.

Is that how that works, Harkonnen?


8 posted on 05/11/2021 6:45:49 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke; Jane Long; ransomnote
CDC went all out in the eighties to portray the AIDS/HIV as threatening to breakout into the heterosexual community in an effort to scare Congress into increasing CDC/NIH funding.

Looks like my people, the flubro/anti-vax coalition, is right about EVERYTHING.

The CDC guidance following herd who was feared into 'taking the jab' is finding out they've been lied to every step of the way.

Maybe you can John Wayne that vax out of your body. Make an 'X' shaped incision on your forearm and get a cowboy to suck the blood out. Make sure he spits it out, though, so he don't get that poison in his own body.

Its not too late.

#WhatWouldJohnWayneDo


9 posted on 05/11/2021 6:51:03 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
CDC (and allied agencies) staffers who recommend that Americans wear a mask should be required to wear 10,000% more masks than they recommend for others. ;-)

What should we do to the 'regular people' who towed the CDC line (and still do) all over the internet.

Do we excuse them on the grounds that they are simple minded sheep?

Or should they be made to suffer consequences for enabling the lying derp state and heathen Chinee enemy.


10 posted on 05/11/2021 6:55:02 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson