Posted on 05/10/2021 8:02:53 PM PDT by White Lives Matter
Arizona GOP Chair Dr. Kelli Ward released a video update on Monday morning on America’s Audit. Dr. Ward went on to explain “the big router lie” by the Maricopa County officials.
Maricopa County had 2.1 million votes in 2020 and therefore required a large system to handle them and therefore the county would need hardware routers for the election. The routers would never be used for data storage because they could not support the amount of information.
Maricopa County insisted last week they could turn over the routers because they are shared with law enforcement.
Dr. Kelli Ward explained in this video that if an election is to be certified its routers should not and could not be shared with law enforcement. This is not allowed.
Earlier today Joe Hoft at The Gateway Pundit explained that routers show where data was sent and when it was sent and that is why Maricopa County does not want to turn over the routers.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Almost zero chance it was “shared with Law Enforcement”
Law Enforcement is not trained in internet security.
This is just a delay technique.
Correct. It’s a stall tactic.
perp walks all around
Does that mean law enforcement knows how people voted?
Your guess is good as mine.
I would seriously doubt that LE knew how people voted, or even how the routers worked. They probably hire out technicians or a private company to handle this type of work. So the question is...who is the private company? Once you dig up the name...it’s going to be some funny connection where so-and-so’s cousin is the owner of this, and they are direct-Biden supporters.
Do you know how simple it is to clear a log from a router? I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for this evidence.
The routers only store traffic history, not actual data. So the county’s contention that it would violate data privacy is a BS. They do not want the traffic history exposed that shows the the elections office was sending and receiving data from unexpected and suspect IP addresses on election day.
I’m thinking if the routers could be wiped clean, they would have done it already. Also, if they could be wiped clean, the State Senate wouldn’t be asking for them, and the BOS wouldn’t be stonewalling about giving them up.
A vote is one bit of information, or two or three if there are 4 candidates or 8, so handling 2 million votes amounts to a few megabytes of info - something a router can do in a few milliseconds.
If it can’t be audited, it doesn’t belong in an election. Whatever is on it belongs to the voters.
Thanks. That’s what I was thinking. Why isn’t some IT guy calling BS on the county? IT guys love to do this.
I guess my question should have been what I asked the first time I saw this story.
Can I assume these machines are on a local network?
A router isn’t needed for a local network...in any case....so
Why were routers needed for an election? Machines weren’t supposed to be connected to the internet.
You can build a local area WIFI network LAN using the same routers and you just wouldn’t connect it to a WAN wide area network to an ISP.
Actually some in law enforcement are rather well trained in such things. The Secret Service puts on a very intensive class about it and hacking and others IT related issues
Exactly what I was thinking this is really just going down the wrong rabbit hole
thanx...
When I read the Antrim legal brief submitted by the plaintiffs yesterday, there was information on the dominion machines that shouldn’t have been there. Specifically Microsoft programs that were database related. How did it get there?
Duh, it came from an IP through a router to the Dominion machine.
My theory has been stated prior: the voting databases were cross referenced at an offsite location with signatures. Those voter roles were used to discover who hadn’t voted yet. Then those registered voters received pre-printed ballots assigned to them. This requires the voting machines to keep second to second contact with databases to know how many votes are needed, who hasn’t voted, and assign registered voters to pre-printed ballots (that don’t actually need to be physically counted), whose images are pre-stored.
The results in an election landslide would be: 1. high registered voter turnout. 2. People who voted, but actually claim that they didnt (see census data). 3. People who came to vote late, and ‘something had already voted for them. 4. A ton of computer activity to IP addresses (router logs) to other computers that should not occur. 5. Mail in ballots (if left in a warehouse) that were never folded. 6. Ballots forgeries in some cases were in real ballots couldn’t be stolen. 7. Targeting of specific democratic urban areas wherein poll workers could cooperate for big changes, and small gains by computer only in others, so won’t effect bell weather counties.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.