Nice try, troll.
Posted on 05/04/2021 4:52:22 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
I think I’ve seen you referring to those opposed to the mRNA jabs as “Flat Earthers”.
But here’s an article from a professional science writer walking through medical journal articles discussion specific adverse events in the human body from exposure to the spike protein, and all you do is make jokes.
After pretending you “wanted REAL science” or something.
Did you even bother to click through to the medical links, or are you really in actuality just a troll?
“a professional science writer walking through medical journal articles discussion specific adverse events “
“*A* professional science writer”...
Not very convincing don’t you agree?
If you're too uneducated, or your IQ is too low, to follow, just admit it. There's lots of room for you in the Democrat Party, you're busy acting like a Democrat anyway.
Of course anyone who doesn’t hate Trump’s vaccines, that he recommends, is a DU idiot-
if that makes you feel good then LOL!
I got your expert consensus right here.
The Covid pandemic has probably been the worst expert failure since the Cold War.
In this series, @YearCovid is retracing the jaw-droppingly bad advice given by experts – starting with the warnings against border closures. A must-read.https://t.co/Mx11qhBbd9 pic.twitter.com/3j7dAw0sAN— Sam Bowman (@s8mb) May 4, 2021
“you’re busy acting like a Democrat anyway.”
Yeah, all people supporting Trump’s vaccines are “busy acting like a Democrat”.
LOL!
Nice try, troll.
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
*gasp*
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah!
Trouble with that theory is, stupid people get old too.
You used name calling lameness twice in one post. I’ll bet your handlers are proud of you.
How much does daddy fauci pay you per post?
Or, what are you, like twelve?
What your name calling claims to know of my intelligence, shows you really know nothing at all of the matter, which make your name calling foolishness.
Regarding your request, you’ll get nothing, due to you being a useful idiot.
Look up that term, because you’re the exact definition of it as used by the Marxists and as you follow in their footsteps and vomit out their propaganda. Keep pushing the Marxist agenda comrade. “Everyone” (as you posted) sees through your charade.
“Regarding your request, you’ll get nothing”
LOL!
I’m quite aware that idiots won’t defend their idiocy.
Much better than somebody who says that because they're old, youngsters should heed them.
I'll go with the 'professional science writer', on this one, geezo.
Pretty much.
Correct. Continue.
I am in excellent health and in my age group, I have over a 99% chance of recovery if I catch the China virus. I believe that I may have had it in early January of 2019. I have asked many times why I should take an experimental vaccine for an anomaly that I will no doubt recover from. No one has given me a good answer.
While it seems clear that all of the COVID inoculations carry a small risk of clotting, it really shouldn’t be all that surprising since the virus itself also is known to cause the very same symptoms but at a rate 8-10 times that all four major vaccines.
Curiously, unlike the actual virus, the numbers seem to skew toward younger people. Which of course should call into question the wisdom or lack thereof vaccinating teens and younger.
Pfizer and Moderna: 4 in a million.
J&J and AstraZeneca: 5 in a million.
The all-natural COVID vaccine: 39 in a million. Along with other “side effects” including death.
39 in a million...so far.
With the slow walking of data entry into VAERS, and Harvard’s estimate that VAERS only catches 1% of the true adverse events.
3900 in a million
is 3,900 / 1, 000, 000
is 3.9 / 1, 000
comparable to the death rate from the coof (which is concentrated in the old, not equally distributed through the population)
...and leaving out the risk of ADE;
AND the risk of “every 6 month” booster shots.
I think I mistook your meaning.
Pfizer 4 in a million —> 1% in VARS makes it 400 in a million.
and so on with ADE and boosters.
The 39/1,000,000 is from infection as stated in the Oxford paper I linked.
And, we have to be careful with the raw VAERS numbers. The clotting has been identified to be a specific and rare type and the data can easily be mixed with background clotting cases. Clots are not a rare occurrence. People die every single day from blood clots.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.