Posted on 05/04/2021 4:52:50 AM PDT by TrueMIGirl77
You are using hobbit rulers and scales
If Carters and Bidets were holding rulers, the photo would make sense
Look at the proportions of even the Xidens to the chairs. Do the Carters own miniaturized furniture to accommodate their aged, shrunken bodies too?
If the Xidens sat in those chairs, they would collapse.
that’s about the most photoshopped image ever seen!!
they really are flipping the bird to all of us!!
That’s a big cat
You bring up a good point.
Would the front of the chair be flat, or concave?
We cannot see the complete backs of the chairs, but I think that there is some indication that they rise toward the outer edges of the photograph.
It is simple optical distortion. Everything is exaggerated in size toward the edges of the image. Like Greenland on a flat world map.
Some photographer thought he was being clever, producing this Willy Wonka image.
Read later.
Carter had better not try to pet him!
What is that wooden piece to the right of Biden ...an open cabinet door? How did he squeeze in front of it and kneel down? The angle of that door looks odd compared to the side table below it, and out of proportion to that table as well.
I could have taken a better picture with my $200 Umidigi phone.
It’s the fake Joe. Notice the chin.
Carter’s shoes tell me the shot of him was taken with a wide angle lens, like something in the 28mm to 20mm range. Everything else about him, the chairs and his wife fit a wide angle shot, her shoes are more normal because they are not as close as his are to the camera.
Everything else has to be a photoshop job, I know of no way to make two people seem so much larger just using a camera. No matter what lens you use, the 4 people should all be the same approximate size, unless one individual is much closer to the camera than the others. That’s the way camera lens perspetive works, I’ve used it lots of time to get more interesting shots. I have a decent shot taken looking down a guitar neck from the tuners that turned out to have good perspective, and the neck seems to slim down a lot more than it actually does as it gets closer to the guitar body. Same as you see here with his feet, the tuning head seems huge compared to the guitar neck.
But the other two people being so large is just not possible by just using a wide angle lens. Carter is sitting slouched back in a chair and jill just towers over him. Carter’s wife looks like a munchkin. No way to do that even using the specialty photo options in my camera.
I can make it look like it was taken with toy camera, black & white, pick one color and the rest black and white, and several other options, all in camera. Ithink it might have a digitl fish eye option, can’t remember. Then in post processing I can turn a color shot into black and white, make it look like an oil painting, increase or decrease lighting, contrast and specific color ranges, turn it into a negative, all sorts of stuff.
But I can’t make it do what I see here unless I take two separate pictures and then copy & paste one onto the other. Those 4 people posed in that specific picture would not be so seriously different sizes. Especially carter’s wife, she would not look like a midget compared to the bonehead beside her.
Carter’s shoes tell me his picture was taken at a wide angle setting, probably an 18-55mm lens at or near the 18-20mm range. I have 2 of them that would do that. OK, 3, but one is still put up in a box, never been used. I only need one...I took a shot of downtown at 18mm, the power poles on either side were visibly leaning inward at about a 10 degree angle. Made for a really odd looking picture. I can’t use it much at 18mm if anything like a door frame is in the picture. It almost gets a fisheye effect.
This has to be a photoshop job that somebody didn’t check closely before just throwing it on twatter. No other way too get that efect that I know of.
I use GIMP, which is an open source photoshop replacement, it will not do what I see here, except by copy & paste a second picture into the first. Most often, I use Irfan View, which only has simple, basic editing options, which is usually all I need. Crop and resize, maybe push the contrast a bit and I’m done. I try to get what I want right out of the camera without spending ages on post processing. If I go out and take 250 shots of birds, which I do fairly often, I might get 30 keepers, and if I had to edit each one to get a good shot, I’d be staring at the computer till 3AM. No thanks. I keep the camera set to give me what I want in a JPEG to begin with, and I don’t have to spend much time at all on editing.
But I can’t do this without two separate pictures and copy & paste.
“Even the chairs wouldn’t be large enough to have the Biden’s sit down?”
EXACTLY!
I was going to post... “Where did they get those teeny, tiny chairs?”
This looks “photo shopped to me, NOT “perspective”.
What is this? A wife swapping picture?
Don’t tell me . . . the Bidens are nefilim!
Photoshopped, I agree.
They did Jill pretty well, but Creepy Joe looks totally photoshopped.
But WHY?
But WHY?
Perhaps the White House photographer is crack-buds with Hunter. He/she/it has consistently messed up photogs, or neglected to make the boss look good...
Legends in their own minds.
I see. So does Jimmy Carter really have ginormous feet, or was Jimmy Carter's head and torso cut and pasted separately from his legs and feet?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.