Abbas wants 'not a single Israeli' in future Palestinian state
Jul 29, 2013 — proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect ...https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSBRE96T00920130730
Re Jimmy Carter’s 2006 “book”:
Kenneth Stein, director of the Institute for the Study of Modern Israel, resigned Tuesday as Middle East Fellow of the Carter Center of Emory University, stating in his resignation letter that “President Carter’s book on the Middle East, a title too inflammatory to even print, is not based on unvarnished analyses; it is replete with factual errors, copied materials not cited, superficialities, glaring omissions, and simply invented segments.”
“The purpose of the book should be to try to bring people together, to try and reconcile them. He published in the LA Times because his book tour is going in that direction,” Stein said. “I’m a historian, I believe in the integrity of my profession, I believe that things should be written accurately, even if you disagree with them.”
... “I think the point of the book is to be hostile to Israel,” Hier said. “I think he deliberately did it.”
Hier said the book sides with the Palestinian cause and blames Israel for troubles in the Middle East.
“The reason he wrote this book is because he has become a spokesman for the Palestinian cause,” Hier said. “Having read the book, I can tell you these are not the words of a person who is objective, who is trying to see a way out of this. He has come down 100 percent on the Palestinian side.”
https://www.foxnews.com/story/jimmy-carter-fires-back-at-longtime-aide-over-book
From Carter’s own words:
“The book is devoted to circumstances and events in Palestine and not in Israel, where democracy prevails and citizens live together and are legally guaranteed equal status.”
https://www.latimes.com/news/la-oe-carter8dec08-story.html
The title makes it clear that the book is about conditions and events in the Palestinian territory and not in Israel. And the text makes clear on numerous occasions that the forced separation and the domination of Arabs by Israelis is not based on race.” Carter explained that he is not using the word to describe racism....
https://www.brandeis.edu/now/2008/january/cartervisit.html
It’s not based on racism.
https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7004473
...critics say it’s got an anti-Israel slant... The former president said
he meant to provoke debate but he also acknowledged that such a provocative term may be counterproductive.
https://www.npr.org/transcripts/7000889