Posted on 03/26/2021 3:59:05 PM PDT by White Lives Matter
Laura Ingraham sometimes is off base – last night was one of those times.
.... Snip....
She gave up on President Trump as soon as the 2020 election was stolen by the Biden gang. She either didn’t have the courage to stand up to FOX Executives or she didn’t have the wits to see what was happening. But within hours Laura was already moving on with the corrupt Biden gang. Because of this, her viewership is half what it was.
In her interview with the President last night, she rudely cut off the President of the United States when he tried to share the facts about the election being stolen.
President Trump shared the following:
And what they did was absolutely disgraceful and if you look at the numbers, the numbers were vastly in favor of us in the Presidential election. It was disgraceful that they were able to get away with it and the Supreme Court didn’t have the courage to do what they had to do.
To which Laura rudely interrupts and says:
Yeah, well speaking as a, speaking as a lawyer, we’re not going to relitigate the past tonight. But speaking as a lawyer I think that going forward, I think any candidate running for office has to have a heck of a legal strategy in place before, like long before the election takes place.
That was it. What an absolute outrage. Ingraham sides with FOX News executives. She blames the President for the Democrats stealing the election. She ignores and shuts down the President. She claims a better legal strategy will prevent massive Democrat fraud – when the courts refuse to hear the President’s cases.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
She really was. I don’t normally watch her show, but I did because President Trump was on.
I don’t know what she thought she was accomplishing, but if her goal was to alienate Trump supporters, “Mission Accomplished.”
True. I love both of them.
I would like to add Greg Gutfeld. I really like him.
[STOP WATCHING FOX!]
I had imposed my own Fox boycott but have had to greatly compromise my principles so as to not miss our real POTUS, who has granted 7 of his recent dozen interviews to FNC.
Did not appreciate Laura’s quashing PDJT’s valid points about how his reelection was clearly sabotaged by the RATS, etc.
Hi Judy!
Every morning I listen to Mike Gallagher. 9 AM or 10 AM, EST.
mikeonline.com
He watches Tucker Carlson and often has clips from the show the night before.
I have read that he had trouble finding lawyers who were willing to represent him. They were too afraid they’d lose their jobs. And endanger their families.
I have also read that Laura is very rude to her staff. She was good with the Covid stuff, great doctors on her show, but she’s very erratic regarding President Trump. I haven’t watched her since the election.
I wouldn’t blame Trump if he just played golf and enjoyed being a billionaire for the rest of his life.
Who needs this shite!
Talk about not getting his DESERVED respect! Sheesh!
Stopped watching her idiotic displays long before I stopped watching FOXNews period.......
Me too. Can’t stand her......she’s another Ann Coulter in my book
Stopped watching her idiotic displays long before I stopped watching FOXNews period.......
Me too. Can’t stand her......she’s another Ann Coulter in my book
No, you’re not alone. People who wanted to help him feared...perhaps for their lives...but certainly for all they hold dear.
Please see #86. :)
His legal team for the Inquisitor Plenipotentiary Mueller, err, Special Counsel Mueller, investigation did a superb job. Which made the complete Charlie Foxtrot of the election litigation all the more shocking. Orly Taitz would have been hard pressed to produce less in the way of concrete results, and her fee would have been far less.
Well, who was he going to get?
There weren’t many lawyers willing to take the cases for fear of the Left and what they would do.
The President was never intimidated, thank the Lord. One of the things that made him such a badass.
But that’s easy when you’re a billionaire and The President of the United States at the same time.
The rest of those folks have to go on making a living. And I’m sure more than one of them had a visit, woke up with a horse head in their bed or had a dead fish delivered to their doorstep.
She is not eligible to practice law. Therefore she is either a former attorney or a former lawyer. She's entitled to give free legal advice, but then everyone on this forum can do that. An attorney can charge for it.
What’s with her teeth? They keep getting bigger.
He does t have all that many outlets left. He has to get out there.
Is that like the Pennsylvania legislators who were crying foul, had their state Supreme Court say they can’t sue as there was no injury, and the tell them that it was too late to bring their case.
Can’t stand Barr, but he and the President were well aware of the one thing that was going to cost hi the election , Mail In Voting. They were both very vocal about it.
State legislatures, SOSs, AGs and governors let it happen or were complicit in it.
Every piece of evidence has and was brought out, in the open from the start.
Doing a PowerPoint on it does nothing. He had to get into a courtroom. Places he was never allowed.
One of the things that I think is often overlooked is that President Trump played by the rules. Did he use EOs? Yes. But I my after giving Congress a chance to do their job. He allowed Governors to Govern and Mayors to do MYor stuff. And had no problem exposing the incompetent ones.
The vaccines are a perfect example. He helped get the developed and ready. He allowed the states to set up their own protocols. And in the case of NY, the world gets to see what a incompetent, corrupt moron Cuomo is.
I’m the third.
Easy to bitch from your keyboard.
Not so easy she. Your career will be derrotes and ANTIFA will show up at your home and office.
True.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.