Posted on 03/09/2021 8:38:15 AM PST by PJ-Comix
For a stark contrast to the silly fawning by much of the U.S. media over the Sunday night Oprah Winfrey interview starring Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, look no further than Good Morning Britain host (and former CNN host) Piers Morgan.
Morgan penned an acidulous takedown for the U.K. Daily Mail that even puts fury in the headline: "Meghan and Harry's nauseating two-hour Oprah whine-athon was a disgraceful diatribe of cynical race-baiting propaganda designed to damage the Queen as her husband lies in hospital - and destroy the Monarchy."
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
I meant to say $140,000 a year property tax
"Archie" is not in line to sit on the throne. There are a lot of people in front of him. Thing is -- Harry knows this; but, says nothing as his wife goes on about her son not being "Prince". Andrew's children are not "Prinesses", they are Lady, so and so. Edward's children are not Princesses, they are Lady, so and so. Why does Meaghan think her boy is supposed to be a "Prince"? Just because Archie has a few drops of "black" blood in him, he should be treated differently.
My opinion, not that the Royal Family has asked, would be to remove the titles completely and cut them off from any more funding from the Royal Family (I think I read that Charles is the one who has been giving them funds.)
Cut them off -- they should be happy since they will then cease to have to be taking money from such racists.
“And he may know he is not the son of Charles.”
Anyone can tell Harry has no resemblence to any of the royals.
I figure this will be the next shoe to drop if Charles pushes anything against Harry.
The red headed guy who was giving Diana riding lessons, has come out and said that Harry was 2 years old when he first met Diana. They may have had a fling; but, Harry is Charles' son. The red hair comes from her family -- her father was a red head, and so is her brother.
Archie gestated about 12 months.
What is this about a marriage three days before the big wedding? And what’s the deal about Archie being a prince? Thank you.
My understanding is that Piers felt he was used by Markle afew years ago, that she cozied up to him solely to get within Harry’s social circle. Her schtick about being innocent and naive about the royal family probably infuriated him no end.
The English monarchy is an institution with a centuries old and well documented history of bloody wars, assignations of it’s members and plots and court intrigues and outright murder in pursuit of the throne.
These two and ‘’the royal family’’ are two scorpions in a bottle. They deserve each other.
Actually, I have seen a photo of a young Prince Phillip, and there is a resemblance to his grandfather.
Very true.
Will the Queen ask Parliament to do the will of her subjects, and strip them of their titles, and remove them from the line of succession?
I don’t think she will, but still hope to be pleasantly surprised.
I listened to that part of the interview again, and I believe what Harry said was that his father stopped taking his calls during Megxit time, but now does take his calls.
Andrew’s children are the Queen’s grandchildren, and both daughters are called Princess. Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie.
Charles sons are also the Queen’s grandchildren and both are called Princes. Prince William and Prince Henry (Harry).
But, Harry’s children (Archie & yes, I bet it’s gonna be Diana) are GREAT-grandchildren, and therefore are not entitled to be princes and princesses.
The only exception to the above rule is for the direct-in-line heirs, hence Prince William’s son is Prince George. I believe the Queen also extended that exception to William’s other children as well.
Guess Baby #2 will be named Jughead. ;)
Ya caught me completely off guard with that one.
Now I have to clean monitor. :)
Or Moose but let’s not bring sisters. cheese and other stuff to this thread. It’s messy enough as it is.
she claims she was married three days before and the Hapless Halfwitt affirmed. Just the two of them and the Archbishop
There are many reasons why this was a lie...and it backfired.
That was one storm
The other storm was over Archie being black
She claims Archie wasnt given the title of Prince because Granny is racist. She didnt say Granny but ultimately Granny is the one the decides what to do...she can make exceptions like with Georges siblings but they are in direct line of the throne
Today’s theoretical conspiracies’ are tomorrows facts.
Not just once. :)
Interesting. I thought she claimed to not know who Harry was.
Seriously? She’s never been in a grocery store line and checked out the tabloids? She doesn’t use a computer or understand Google?
Absurd.
Well, as a proper Southern Lady would say, “Well, Bless their lil’ old hearts.” ;)
I would not even know where to begin spending that kind of money.
Charities that are on the up-and-up? Orphanages (do they still exist?)?
Maybe divide it into personal packages and put them in the mailboxes of people in poor neighborhoods.
After paying off the mortgage, car loan and any other debts; then giving my husband and children (especially the children) a sum that will ensure a worry-free life.
Harry looks nothing like his father or brother.
LOL! Sorry about that!
At least the royals are good for laughs!
All the best to you and yours!
Julie
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.