Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Ann Archy

There are two general categories of NG order architecture.

One is through their own state governor’s (but can be state legislature’s), and are partially/largely covered by their various state budgets (albeit still receiving limited DoD federal funds for training, equipment, readiness, etc.)

When NG (as force multipliers) are ordered to deploy by DoD, they are then subordinate to the DoD vs their governor/state. Roughly speaking, while on fed DoD orders, the pot of money normally switches to Federal funding.

Especially for the discussion of a fraudulent, anti-American, global socialist takeover of our government, one of the most important aspects of NG units across America becomes subordination.

Really, the only way for a state to stop their NG services from being used against their own population would be all liberty loving states to do a “TEXIT”.

Without this, under “Buyden”, we will likely see all NG used as “force multipliers” against state/US citizens, on orders from the executive branch/DoD, which then force NG units to “federal status”, or they will be “insubordinate” under UCMJ regulation.

This is really the same architecture of the NAZI take over of all German forces, intelligence, and police in the 30’s.


73 posted on 02/13/2021 10:29:12 AM PST by patriotfury ((May the fleas of a thousand camels occupy mo' ham mads tents!) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: patriotfury
"There are two general categories of NG order architecture...One is through their own state governor’s ...and are partially/largely covered by their various state budgets...When NG (as force multipliers) are ordered to deploy by DoD, they are then subordinate to the DoD vs their governor/state."

In this instance, the libs may have dropped a few mines in their own path on their long march through the institutions. The turmoil and upheaval the left generated in their opposition to the draft and the Vietnam War caused a lot of introspection within the DOD.

One conclusion was that a large, standing conscript Army led to a significant gulf between the military and the public at large. With the end of the draft and initiation of an all volunteer force, a decision was made to place an increased reliance on the reserve and national guard.

By doing so, it was hoped that, unlike Vietnam, most every community would be vested in a national emergency or large scale deployment. When the grocer, maybe a doctor, one of the cops and a teacher from the town that everybody knows are all called up by their reserve or NG unit, the community would tend to pay closer attention, and at least initially, be more likely to support the effort, and this theory seemed to be pretty much validated during Desert Shield/Desert Storm.

But I think this same arrangement is going to make using the military against the public much more difficult. First of all, that grocer, cop, teacher, etc. is going to be much less inclined to operate against the interests of the people in their own community, especially knowing they will at some point, want to return to their civilian careers. Likewise, the community that may strongly support them going overseas to serve our country in some foreign action, is going to be far more likely to turn against them (and their families) should the servicemember be part of an effort against the American people.

91 posted on 02/13/2021 5:07:47 PM PST by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson