Posted on 02/09/2021 8:17:50 AM PST by Salohcin
“the excess energy needed to ship this oil (over rails) would be enough to power 490,000 cars per year.”
And I’ve heard that the rail tracks and equipment that haul this particular oil is owned by Warren Buffett. Don’t know if it’s true, but if it is, he sure lucked out when Joe got in the White House. I’m sure none of the decisions were intentionally made to help out Buffett. (◔_◔)
I’d like to see her data that says they WILL get a green job. These jobs are pure make-believe now. All money spent on green new deal will be given to cronies and political supporters....not the folks losing their jobs now.
The demonratcommieblmantifaterrorscumpedophilegoatrapers will offer all those Workers Sales Jobs in the Wind Generation Tower biz.
Yes, good point, it was Peter Doocy of Fox News. It was my intention to focus on Psaki’s reply rather than the questioner, but I can see how leaving out Doocy’s name just begged the question of who was the reporter.
Guess she didn’t get the memo that Faux News is on their side now.
She is an idiot and she plays one at the pressers.
She also said “millions of jobs created” with the green EO.
Where’s that report? Will any of them dare ask that question?
Excellent article to read.
The Chicago Contrarian
The Rise of Anti-Merit: Objective Criteria Goes by the Wayside in Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives at Chicago Companies
February 16, 2021 Alisa ROSENBAUM
Executives are worried about the legality and business impacts of “woke” discrimination in hiring and promotion.
Based on interviews with private sector leaders across the manufacturing and professional services industries, The Chicago Contrarian senses a radical shift in hiring and promotion policies in Chicagoland companies. 2021 has thrown “merit to the periphery,” creating what one local executive describes as “the rise of woke nepotism” in hiring and promotion.
This is a dramatic shift. “Even before the advent of modern democracies, businesses have generally relied upon one primary metric to gauge performance and the worth of individual employees and job candidates: merit,” he observes.
Granted, other factors also have historically played a key role in hiring and advancement. Economic cycles (i.e., growth vs. contraction), government policy/regulations (e.g., the elimination of the Keystone Pipeline will cost thousands of skilled workers their jobs), and interpersonal relationships also matter, no doubt. Yet despite these considerations, merit has been the single biggest factor that determines success for employers and employees alike in the past.
But times are changing.
Gaslighting merit.
“In 2021, what we are seeing is really the opposite of merit-based hiring,” a senior research analyst observes. “This can put up insurmountable barriers to those which fall outside of a selected bucket.” She notes that “2021 practices place primary emphasis for evaluation on alternative factors to merit. It deemphasizes demonstrated capability, skills, track record and certifications when considering recruitment, promotion and contract awards.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.