Well you answered my quesiton. My second pot was just a statement that its present usuage makes Congress an afterthought. I don’t if the founders intended that.
Any way the Rats would have challenges lined up in federal court in front of sympathetic judges before one could get the documents binded. Republicans sit around like a bed of clams then wonder what happended.
Typo: pot = post
Well Congress does have to raise the Constitutionality of it, if they think the EO is unconstitutional. If they don’t then it becomes law. Of course if one president executes an EO, the following president can rescind it with another EO. That’s what President Trump did with Obama EOs, and the constitutionality of eliminating DACA was taken to court. Where the court ruled against President Trump.