Here's the bottom line: TOTAL deaths in the US spiked up over 15% in 2020. That's total; not deaths shuffled between categories. Normal jumps are 0.3% - 0.7%. 15% happens during something like WWII. Deaths from all other causes in 2020 were at or slightly above normal levels. In total, 400,000 more people died in 2020 than in 2019. During that time, doctors - whose medical licenses, careers, and freedom are on the line if they commit medical fraud or malpractice - say they've been losing patients to a new disease. It takes a special kind of absurd thinking to believe that a million doctors in the US a tens of millions of other doctors around the world have all gotten together to suddenly make fraudulent claims, and got all the nurses involved, and all the lab workers doing the testing, and all the medical examiners, and all various health departments, and all the families of the dead people. And that this mass conspiracy of a billion people worldwide just happened to coincide with a 15% jump in deaths in the US in a single year.
All the energy spent trying to make believe these deaths didn't happen SHOULD be spent working to PROSECUTE the people who drove up the number of deaths. People like governors Cuomo and Newsom who forced nursing homes to accept known-infected patients. That cost the lives of tens of thousands of defenseless elderly folks. Their deaths matter. Pretending they don't is insulting. Pretending they didn't happen is insulting.
Knock off the nonsense with the fairy tale make-believe about there not being any deaths from this and start working to hold those monsters accountable for their tens of thousands of !
All the energy spent trying to make believe these deaths didn’t happen SHOULD be spent working to PROSECUTE the people who drove up the number of deaths. People like governors Cuomo and Newsom who forced nursing homes to accept known-infected patients.
‘Knock off the nonsense with the fairy tale make-believe about there not being any deaths from this...’
well, see here’s the thing; the posted article is challenging the the data promiulgated by the Centers for Disease Control, and IMHO makes for an interesting and compelling challenge to these data; you then rebut the challenge by citing the very data the article questions, and expect us to simply drop our skepticism because, well, because it’s the government...
as for doctors and reputations, I guess it’s escaped your notice that those doctors whose reps have suffered the most are those who’ve question the CDC orthodoxy; they have been ostracized by their colleauges, shut out from publishing findings, and in general intimidated into silence...and I guess you think doctors are ethically above noting on which side their bread is buttered...
and I find nothing about the article’s death cert treatment the least bit confusing regarding article 32...