That's what I love to see, evidence that there were cultures building massive structures in a region which supposedly wasn't populated.
Posted on 01/05/2021 10:30:32 AM PST by Rakhi Sarkar
Serious question.
Might there be fish sticks in these pyramids?
IIRC the pyramids are around 400 ft high. Ate these things 400 ft high? Might as well go back and read the story.
They also found a submerged cigar-shaped UFO next to ‘56 Chevy
Nope. That aint it. Fake video imo. Well, it’s not really a video, just a manipulated image.
Looks like the Mayans built it, maybe parts of Central America sank.
Cannot be Atlantis because Atlantis is in the Pegasus Galaxy. I saw it on TV so it must be true.
A 2nd July 2002 Update of the Undersea City off Cuba! - Involves National Geographic!
Rakhi Sarkar has only post #1’s since joining in December.
Disclaimers for archaeology-world:
All the information on this website – https://archaeology-world.com/ – is published in good faith and for general information purpose only. archaeology-world does not make any warranties about the completeness, reliability and accuracy of this information.
From our website, you can visit other websites by following hyperlinks to such external sites. While we strive to provide only quality links to useful and ethical websites, we have no control over the content and nature of these sites. These links to other websites do not imply a recommendation for all the content found on these sites.
That's what I love to see, evidence that there were cultures building massive structures in a region which supposedly wasn't populated.
The effects of the huge meteor strike which convoluted and created the Gulf of Mexico may have some bearing on the elevation /suubsidence geodynamic over time. It is reputed to have destroyed the dinosaurs and much of the fauna which dwelled on the surface. So these deeper areas, such as the current site off Cuba now 2500 feet below sea level may have been at some point dry during the glacial era as sea levels were much lower. This posits that the Cuban site may be a great deal more ancient than 4000 years. It would more likely have to be 15000 to 25000 years old, which would cover the extent of that glacial period. The land would have been populated by mammoths and such, and the actual site may have been a port at sea level as it then was.
The larger question about the subsidence is whether it was cataclysmic or gradual, or both in different geological eras. The imagery of the Cuba site buildings do not appear to be damaged by cataclysm. So the water levels likely rose to cover it as the glaciers melted and sea levels rose around the world.
This site will reveal a lot about ancient history and the antediluvian civilizations, the evidence of which remains spotty and is rendered scientifically anomalous,a huge mistake. At one time the Gulf of Mexico was a huge basin, full of rivers and lakes, just as much of the Mediterranean was during the glacial era.Cuba would have been a mountain range at the foot of which the ancient structures were built.
It's spam, like everything else posted by the Archaeology World posse. Anoop got banned for the AW pimping, here's hoping these three new ones get the boot as well.
Weren’t we neighbors? :^)
Weren’t we neighbors? :^)>>>>>>>>>>>
I’d say so.
Antediluvian society was quite neighborly despite the Mastodons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
