Yet Sleepy Joe Basement-Biden miraculously "won" by somehow accumulating an all-time Presidential election record-shattering 81.3 MILLION votes! (Yeah, right. Ain't buyin' it.)
Posted on 01/02/2021 11:58:35 AM PST by hapnHal
Every Legal Vote is a citizen coalition using reports, affidavits and math to answer the key 2020 election questions: was there fraud, was it widespread, and did it impact the outcome of the election? See something suspicious? Let us know.
This site is not able to validate such information, but will share it with those who can. Help preserve election integrity.The Top 10 Proofs of Fraud
Fraud is real. Fraud happens every day. In elections, fraud is a common issue. Regardless of what Twitter and Facebook say, fraud has happened in many elections in the US. Here are some of the top 10 ways that fraud can happen in an election:Read and sign petition.
Go to Web site and read..........
www.everylegalvote.com
(Excerpt) Read more at everylegalvote.com ...
Please read
Sign petition and forward
Over 5 Million have signed (12 pm PT)
No, it's a web site set up by Russell James Ramsland, jr. the same who set up a another fake web site for his ASOG corporation a few days after the election. This is the same grifter who managed to fool Sidney Powell into believing his company had any experience at all in auditing elections or anything for that matter.
Biden did not win fair and square. He is not willing to support an audit, so he wants to hide the truth.
Excellent site. I am going to forward to all my contacts. THANKS !!
“”
BiXiden[’s ‘Rat minions] STOLE the election Fair and Square.
Just ask Traitor Roberts.
Did you actually read the report signed by Russell Ramsland?
Which part of it do you believe was fake or incorrect, other than the fact that he was so focused on the data that he overlooked which state it was for - an obvious typo?
Why do you allege he is a grifter?
Yet Sleepy Joe Basement-Biden miraculously "won" by somehow accumulating an all-time Presidential election record-shattering 81.3 MILLION votes! (Yeah, right. Ain't buyin' it.)
Not only did I read it, I debunked it here on FR.
More to the point here, what exactly do you or anyone else know about Russel James Ramsland Jr. other than what Russell James Ramsland Jr. has told you about himself?
How much do you know about Allied Special Operations Group, LLC. other than what http://asog.us tells you about Allied Special Operations Group, LLC itself?
> I debunked it here on FR
Link, please?
Nobody on FR seems to have even the slightest curiosity as to just what are Russell James Ramsland Jr.'s bonafides.
I also posted on how Powell actually accepted an affidavit and submitted it in a court briefing from an 8chan admin (known as CodemonkeyZ) who is intimately involved in the creation of QAnon and who similarly claimed to be a "security expert".
The bottom line is a lot of people here are being taken for fools because a few bad actors are saying what they wish to hear.
> I posted bits and pieces across various threads
I want to see the specific links where you rebutted specific parts of his findings, please.
So far, all I see in the article is what I acknowledged about him getting the state wrong, but I don’t see his findings actually invalidated.
(For example, he states this:
2. We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully
designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election
results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot
errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication.
...and we find independent corroboration, such as in Coffee County, that Dominion’s machines were in fact set up to cause adjudication to take place at a very high rate for Republican ballots. Once they are in adjudication, of course, we all know they can be altered at will in a whole batch.)
It's in the first thread I linked. I am simply not going to give you an individual link to each of the posts I made in that thread just because you are too damn lazy to read a thread which consisted of only 40-some odd posts.
My refutation of points 6. and 8. in the thread would obviously refute point 2.
BTW, rejected ballots in Antrim county were manually adjudicated by the Republican county clerk. Antrim County didn't even have the capability of using Dominion ballot imaging and adjudication systems. There is no possible way this tiny county clerk's staff would have manually adjudicated the 17000+ rejected ballots Ramsland suggests without comment. He's clearly the idiot, not them.
Ramsland also proved himself to be an totally incompetent "auditor/expert" in Georgia as well as Michigan: Here’s How Lawyers Destroyed Sidney Powell’s ‘Wildly Unqualified’ Election Malfeasance ‘Experts’ in Georgia
Ayyadurai “appears to claim, in essence, that split-ticket voting among white Republicans is evidence of fraud,” said a counter-report by intervenor expert Jonathan Rodden. There are innocent explanations, Rodden’s counter-report indicates, as to the patterns Ayyadurai spotted. The most obvious is that a number of Republicans simply abandoned Trump to vote for Biden. Indeed, Rodden offered statistical analyses from a number of jurisdictions, including Savannah, Ga., to make this point.So the judge dismissed the case based upon this innuendo and without allowing evidence beyond the initial filing?
“[I]n metro areas around Georgia and the United States,” he wrote, “white metro-area voters who typically vote for Republican candidates continued to do so in down-ballot races, but a number of them voted for the Democratic candidate in the presidential race. It is quite unclear what this pattern of split-ticket voting could possibly have to do with election fraud.”
The intervenors argued that Ayyadurai “provide[d] no indications about his data sources,” “does not explain how he measures his variables,” and that Ayyadurai’s “claims about race and ethnicity are, frankly, inscrutable, and thus difficult to evaluate with data analysis.”
Furthermore, Ayyadurai “does not possess relevant education, experience or background to offer opinions on these topics and, even if he did, he fails to disclose his methodology,” the intervenors argued. “Though Ayyadurai has degrees in engineering and computer science, applied mechanics, and systems biology, he does not explain how these credentials qualify him to offer the opinions at issue.”
“Ayyadurai is an engineer with training in mechanical engineering and biomedical engineering,” but he is not trained in election statistics, the intervenors noted. “[I]t appears this is the first time in his entire career that he has even contemplated . . . issues” involving alleged election malfeasance. And, they argued, his conclusions should be swiftly thrown out of court under the Daubert standard and other relevant law governing expert testimony.
We were discussing Ramsland here, but yes Sidney Powell doesn’t appear to have done any vetting on many of her witnesses which were also easily dismissed in court.
They weren’t “dismissed in court” - they were dismissed before court.
Well, As of 9 pm (PT) 8.3 million have signed the petition.
The Democrats set up a FRAUD election and needs exposure.
No, it's a web site set up by Russell James Ramsland, jr. the same who set up a another fake web site for his ASOG corporation a few days after the election. This is the same grifter who managed to fool Sidney Powell into believing his company had any experience at all in auditing elections or anything for that matter.
Could you kindly cite the case and perhaps describe the evidence you rely upon to conclude Ramsland fooled Sidney Powell? If you are not familiar with any case, or the case documents, perhaps you could identify the state in which this litigation occurred.
It would help if, in whatever case it might be, Sidney Powell was representing one of the parties; and the data problem, or what he "fooled" her with, was not notorious in the national media.
You aren’t paying attention.
Could you kindly cite the case and perhaps describe the evidence you rely upon to conclude Ramsland fooled Sidney Powell? If you are not familiar with any case, or the case documents, perhaps you could identify the state in which this litigation occurred.It would help if, in whatever case it might be, Sidney Powell was representing one of the parties; and the data problem, or what he "fooled" her with, was not notorious in the national media.
[Rightwing Conspiratr1] You aren’t paying attention.
I am paying very close attention and have followed the actual court filings, something you apparently have not done. That, of course, leaves you incapable of identifying the case in which Ramsland fooled Sidney Powell. Indeed, you are incapable of even naming any state in which this took place in any case.
Your various claims imply that Ramsland was as dumb as a box of rocks, suddenly gained such enlightenment that he fooled Sidney Powell, who is implied to not be up to the intellectual power of Ramsland, and then Ramsland is implied to have regressed to a state as dumb as a bag of hammers.
I am not terribly surprised that you cannot cite the case, nor even identify the state where the litigation of your claimed events took place.
It is you have only been paying attention to internet nonsense. Allow me to initiate your enlightenment. It is amazing what one may learn about litigation just by reading the court documents, as opposed to internet blather.
The Ramsland Affidavit that had the incorrect MN/MI data was from 18 Nov in a case where Powell was not counsel. It rapidly was revealed and became news. It is highly unlikely that Powell was fooled after that.
The Affidavit of Russell James Ramsland, Jr., was filed as Document 7-1, an Attachment to a Motion for TRO, in a Georgia case by L. Lin Wood, Jr., represented by his counsel.
Case 1:20-cv-04651-SDG — Document 7-1 — Filed 11/18/20
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.7.1_2.pdf
This was the motion for TRO filed by attorney for L. Lin Wood in Georgia in the case Wood v. Raffensperger, GAND 1:20-cv-04651.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18632787/7/wood-v-raffensperger/
SMITH & LISS, LLC/s/ Ray S. Smith, III
Ray S. Smith, III
Georgia Bar No. 662555
Counsel for Plaintiff
That attorney was Ray Smith.
One day before the Docket ends on 12/23/2020, at Document 73:
73Dec 7, 2020
USCA Opinion received AFFIRMING re: 66 Notice of Appeal filed by L. Lin Wood, Jr. In accordance with FRAP 41(b), the USCA mandate will issue at a later date. Case Appealed to USCA - 11th Circuit. USCA Case Number 20-14418-RR. (kac) (Entered: 12/07/2020)
Dec 7, 2020
APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: 71 APPLICATION for Admission of Sidney Powell Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-10452641).. Attorney Sidney Powell added appearing on behalf of James Kenneth Carroll, Vikki Townsend Consiglio, Carolyn Hall Fisher, Gloria Kay Godwin, Cathleen Alston Latham, Coreco Jaqan Pearson, Brian Jay Van Gundy (nmb)
Sidney Powell entered the case pro hac well after the Affidavit of November 18, 2020 was filed. She came on board for the appellate phase. I am skeptical that Ramsland surprised or fooled Sidney Powell at that late date.
The Ramsland Affidavit was also Exhibit 14 to the Complaint in the Michigan case of King v. Whitmer, MIED 2:20-cv-13134-LVP-RSW, filed there on November 25, 2020.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905/gov.uscourts.mied.350905.1.14.pdf
Sidney Powell was not a counsel in the Michigan case.
If you have been paying attention, what have you got?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.