.............
Posted on 12/27/2020 3:26:39 PM PST by infool7
THIS !
It should be possible to run these odd names through some software. If they have no credit history of other evidence of real life existance...
.............
We need some just courts of justice—somewhere in our land!
Some of these last names are legitimate voters. My grandmother, who once voted reliably Republican but probably now votes illegally for Democrats, had a unique last name. Her husband came of America from a small ethnic group in Europe with the types of names that usually got misspelled at Ellis Island. He died in the war; of their three daughters, two married and moved away, and a drug addict killed the third. They had no sons. So she had no family on her late husband’s side who lived in the state.
My grandmother recently deceased, which means that she should cease to vote. But when she lived on this earth, she voted with her “one-of-a-kind” last name. And those votes should count. After she deceased, she perhaps moved in spirit posthumously to Pennsylvania, even though her body is still interred in a cemetery in a different state, registered to vote, and voted Democrat from the grave. If she accomplished that feat, then her votes should not count.
:D
l8r
Hugh Munbein. Pat Mahiney
This is reminiscent of the Breeders' Cup Pick-six scam in 2002. There was no way the scam would have been detected were there the usual hundreds of winners. But longshots prevailed and my recollection is that there were only four winning tickets. Two were sold at an obscure upstate NY OTB parlor. The results were so anomalous that it was obvious that some sort of fraud had been perpetrated. (See Wikipedia. My recollection was slightly incorrect!)
But at least these guys did some time in prison.
ML/NJ
Princess Consuela Banana-Hammock?
-PJ
And, this isn’t something you can just make up on the spot - it would almost have to be software generated - that many slightly different last names. Is he saying that “Smith’ and his vote was discarded, and that Paduka’s vote was cast in place of Smith?
Not really.
They would just be ignored like all of the evidence presented in affidavits and at hearings already. In fact, there probably have been such whistleblowers. But if the MSM could convince the public that TWA800's center-fuel-tank exploded when ~200 eyewitnesses said they saw a missile (or missiles) rise up and strike the plane, why should this be any different?
ML/NJ
...and have identified 521,879 unique Last Names. 245,033 or just under 47% of the total Last Names in PA only belong to 1 and only 1 person!
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Well which is it, 521,879 or 245,033?
Maybe I’m missing something but those sentences seem contradictory to me. Which brings up a giant issue. The incidents of fraud have not been presented in a simple and understandable way for John Q. Public to understand them. I know the media is complicit but I ask this question. If right now you had to write down three specific reasons (with factual details) that to you proved there was fraud, could you do it? My point is that I think the incidents of how the election was stolen need to be broken down into simple terms understandable AND able to be conveyed (to doubters) by all concerned citizens. I think Rudy needs a great deal of help in this area. We are trying to overturn a presidential election.
...and Paul Twocock
...and don't forget Weiner and Butt
...and who can forget Moe Lester?
I thought this was about stating who the actual winner (vs. pretend winner) was?
Or stated another way, "trying to overturn" the pretend election results.
Shimdlapski.
WTF is wrong with you? Do you really think a non-Democrat would make something like this up?
ML/NJ
Shouldn’t be hard for this guy to provide a list of the 521,879 voters with unique last names.
And it wouldn’t be an invasion of privacy as he supposedly got the names from public records.
Or a chance to dig their hole deeper so their sentences will be even longer.
> Well which is it, 521,879 or 245,033?
>
> Maybe I’m missing something but those sentences seem contradictory to me.
>
No contradiction. Let me illustrate with an example:
In the following set of names:
Jane Doe
John Doe
Marc Smith
There are two unique last names: Doe and Smith.
One of them, Smith only belongs to 1 and only 1 person.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.