Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Onthebrink

The original conception was a real game-changer. It seemed to have tremendous potential. Technically a destroyer, many people considered it to be a stealthy battleship with real 21st century technology. And the possible future addition of a true rail gun.

But congress cut funding, and the 30+ fleet of Zumwalts became just a few outrageously expensive experimental ships. The ammunition was too costly, the rail gun isn’t happening, and no one really wants to send an experimental platform into a war zone.

Failed program, in my view.


3 posted on 12/27/2020 7:13:25 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

The propulsion system has more power than those in the current destroyers/frigates. My guess is that’s needed for a rail gun if that ever materializes. Along with the LCS (little crappy ships) the Zumwalts are examples of ill thought out programs that find sponsors.

Admiral Rickover taught the Navy how to bend Congress to its will. Meanwhile the Star Wars defense concept was made reality by Israel.


4 posted on 12/27/2020 7:19:35 AM PST by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

I never heard how that ship handled in a heavy seaway. Anyone know?


8 posted on 12/27/2020 7:47:24 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson