~~~~~~
1) Have you EVER seen or heard of a lawyer who releases evidence before it is used at trial?
2) If all you lazy, whining todlers would get off of your butts and do some digging for yourselves, there is a mountain of evidence --of at least six different sorts -- available on line.
3) It's not the job of those of us who DO dig for evidence, ourselves, to spoon-feed all you lazy whiners!
Stop whining. Open your eyes. Dig for yourself. LIKE THIS. OR -- STFU!!!
TXnMA
Sit down.
I have—me, and every other lawyer who has ever tried a civil case. It’s called discovery. We don’t get to hide our evidence before trial.
In any event, it’s hard to use your evidence at trial when you voluntarily dismiss your own case first, as the Trump campaign has done in almost every every suit it has filed where it has claimed election fraud. To date, I’ve only seen two where it didn’t: one in Fulton County, GA is still pending, but the campaign withdrew its motion for emergency injunctive relief, meaning they’re intentionally allowing their case to become moot. The other was in Michigan, where they presented their evidence at a hearing and the judge found the evidence legally insufficient.
2) If all you lazy, whining todlers would get off of your butts and do some digging for yourselves, there is a mountain of evidence --of at least six different sorts -- available on line.
I have spent plenty of time digging. The evidence isn’t there.
It's not the job of those of us who DO dig for evidence, ourselves, to spoon-feed all you lazy whiners!
It’s your job to present evidence if you want your claims to be taken seriously. We have no reason to take you at your word.
TXnMA:
Your emotional rant was childish and petulant.
By the way, you misspelled ‘toddler’. How fitting.