Posted on 12/15/2020 9:45:20 AM PST by WTanner1776
Sometimes it’s hard to know what to believe. As you can read in my article on if John Roberts visited Epstein’s island, there is normally evidence for and against conspiracies. But, in this case, it looks like the audit of Dominion voting machines showed conclusively that the election results, in Michigan, at least, were fraudulent.
Votes were changed. Adjudication was used far more than normal and the logs surrounding it were wiped, as were the server logs. Suspicious software updates took place. The machines flipped votes. Who, and what, can be trusted?
The simple fact is that this audit makes it look like the election was stolen. In areas where similar Dominion machines were used, how do we know that those machines did not also flip votes? How can we trust the election results?
We can’t. A full audit of Dominion voting machines needs to take place. If Trump still loses, so be it. But we cannot rest until we know that the election results are valid. Right now, it appears that they are not. If the audit is to be believed, the election results are nothing if not fraudulent.
(Excerpt) Read more at genzconservative.com ...
bkmk
Using an image like that, you couldn't get at any data that had been overwritten. There are programs to securely delete files that basically write a series of all 0s across the entire file, then all 1s multiple times. If that had been done to the files, you'd get nothing without using a microscope to examine the original hardware platters. Not really worth the effort most times. However, Windows, which is what it looks like the Dominion software is using doesn't typically do that.
You will also lose data if another file is overwrites the physical sectors of the disk where the logs were. Chances are though, that the space was just marked as 'free'. Unless you have a lot of disk writes after the files were deleted, there is an extremely good chance you'll be able to recover most of the data if not all of it. Way back in the dark ages, I did some analysis of the FAT filesystem, and was able to do a lot of interesting stuff with disk utilities, including looking at data in the slack space of files, which would include data from the end of file marker to the end of the actual data sector. Since files are allocated on sector boundries, you can sometimes find evidence of previous files in unallocated space after the end of the file proper. Yeah, I was pretty nerdy.
In my work, I look more at the theoretical end as opposed to the physical end. Thank you for the information.
Try a different browser. I had to use Chrome to open...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.