Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/15/2020 6:46:27 AM PST by WTanner1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: WTanner1776
(Excerpt) Read more at

No.

Get a job.

2 posted on 12/15/2020 6:50:03 AM PST by humblegunner (Balls To Picasso.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WTanner1776

Impossible?

Hold my chinese tea.


3 posted on 12/15/2020 6:52:17 AM PST by dynachrome (People who get what they want are often surprised when they also get what they deserve. ~ james wood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WTanner1776

A more recent lesson can be found in Daniel Okrent’s “Last Call: The Rise and Fall of Prohibition”. The “dry” forces exploited public schools to push forth their anti alcohol ideals and allied themselves with even the KKK (who blamed alcohol consumption on Jews and Catholics). Yet the bootlegging and rum running and illegal stills continued and politicians and others responsible for enacting and enforcing Prohibition kept large private stashes of alcohol for themselves, adding to the hypocrisy. All of this contributed to the grand failure that Prohibition was.


4 posted on 12/15/2020 6:54:01 AM PST by OttawaFreeper ("The Gardens was founded by men-sportsmen-who fought for their country" Conn Smythe, 1966 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WTanner1776

Nobody is giving up their guns. It would be the biggest mistake ever made to try to confiscate guns.


5 posted on 12/15/2020 6:56:42 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WTanner1776

Most Gun Grabbers are not that stupid to have law enforcement going door to door physically confiscating guns from people....LEO’s don’t make that much money to endanger their life to that extent......especially on any mass scale.

They will slowly and methodically shut down the gun industry and basically eliminate the supply of guns...

Re-establish the Assault Weapons Ban, that will eliminate the manufacture of entire classes of guns....

Ban the selling of guns and gun parts on the internet, how many companies will that destroy ??

Demand Banks stop doing business with gun and ammunition manufacturers

Require gun owners and manufacturers carry very expensive liability insurance...

Initiate one lawsuit after another against guns and ammo suppliers....

Some of these have already been tried with success...

Remington was sued by the parents of the children killed in the mass shooting at Sandy Hook, the rifle used was a Bushmaster manufactured by Remington....that case was allowed to proceed and resulted in a significant settlement against Remington....

Cabelas is facing a similar situation by supposedly selling .45 caliber ammunition to a 19-year which resulted in the accidental death of another 19-year old....

These are just 2 of a torrent of lawsuits in the future against anyone involved in the gun industry...


6 posted on 12/15/2020 6:58:09 AM PST by srmanuel (It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WTanner1776

They don’t need to confiscate. If they end sales of ammo, gun powder, and primers, the problem solves itself in a few short years.


7 posted on 12/15/2020 6:58:37 AM PST by TheZMan (I am a secessionist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WTanner1776

That’s not how it works:

You make things so complex, costly, and difficult that you ban guns without actually banning guns.

You expand gun free zones.

You let government agencies drag their feet when it comes to back ground checks.

You disqualify more people from owning guns because of metal issues, prior offenses, etc.

You make ammo more expensive.

You make some guns illegal because they look to scary: i.e. assault weapons.

You make federal law enforcement and the federal courts go after any sort of weapon offense more aggressively.

You push on gun shows, gun stores, etc. to make their life more difficult.

You raise all the fees associated with anything gun related.

You allow insane law suits where weapons manufacturers are targeted more credibility and hear them out in federal courts etc.

You make it more difficult to get a concealed carry by ratcheting up requirements.

You make it to where if you commit any offense you cannot have a weapon while in treatment, etc.

You close gun ranges on the grounds of safety or the environment.

There are a thousand more ways you can approach this. The way you get around the Second Amendment is not by drawing a line through it, but by bureaucratically undermining it to the point where it is de facto meaningless and you have “gun control.”


8 posted on 12/15/2020 6:59:05 AM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WTanner1776

Sadly, it is not impossible. Look at states like Hawaii, New York, and others where it is very difficult to buy a gun. DC, for example. Firearms or virtually banned and very few people have them. Citizens in those areas surrendered.


12 posted on 12/15/2020 7:07:32 AM PST by Reno89519 (Buy American, Hire American! End All Worker Visa Programs. Replace Visa Workers w/ American Workers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WTanner1776
I don't mind going to a blog IF you've presented a compelling open.....

You didn't.

13 posted on 12/15/2020 7:10:05 AM PST by G Larry (Authority is vested in those to whom it applies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WTanner1776

Biden’s bullet ban.


17 posted on 12/15/2020 7:16:40 AM PST by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WTanner1776

I can tell the number of trolls on this thread (will not call them out, but they are easy to tell).


19 posted on 12/15/2020 7:20:26 AM PST by OttawaFreeper ("The Gardens was founded by men-sportsmen-who fought for their country" Conn Smythe, 1966 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WTanner1776

Until 2008 there was no legal right for Americans to own any type of gun. The Heller case in 2008 was the first ruling that determined that the 2nd Amendment applied to individual citizens and not just Gov’t entities like state militias. Conservatives need to recognize that if the Dems pack the Supreme Ct. Heller is likely to be reversed and guns could be outlawed in the U.S.


22 posted on 12/15/2020 7:25:52 AM PST by Roadrunner383
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WTanner1776

Also, mastercard and visa will roll over and spread their legs for the feds. All your purchases are traceable.

“The records show you purchased a lot of 9mm ammo. Where are the weapons associated with these purchases?”


26 posted on 12/15/2020 7:40:16 AM PST by dynachrome (People who get what they want are often surprised when they also get what they deserve. ~ james wood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WTanner1776

Guns?

What guns?

I lost all mine in a tragic boating accident.


36 posted on 12/15/2020 8:08:28 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WTanner1776

But as with the soviet Union, anything can be had on the black market for a price.

In the meantime, time to go buy more ammo....


37 posted on 12/15/2020 8:12:54 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WTanner1776

They are going to stop ammo sales


38 posted on 12/15/2020 8:19:39 AM PST by databoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WTanner1776
Tell it to this guy:

9th Circuit Court decision: WAYNE WILLIAM WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CHARLES L. BECK; . . JAMES EDWARDS; CITY OF LOS ANGELES (Firearms confiscation)

https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2020/12/01/19-55084.pdf

39 posted on 12/15/2020 8:26:06 AM PST by aimhigh (THIS is His commandment . . . . 1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

From yesterday's 'Pookie's Toons':


40 posted on 12/15/2020 8:28:49 AM PST by real saxophonist ("Congress Shall Make No Law..." They should have stopped right there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WTanner1776

When the British tried it.

When the Red Coats seized guns..
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1995/05/31/when-the-redcoats-confiscated-guns/e38d0810-af85-4949-8d93-3da746601e65/

The Post’s May 9 news analysis on militias and America’s revolutionary heritage quotes colonial historian Rosemarie Zagarri as stating that the British “didn’t try to disarm” the Americans and never “prohibited the colonists from bearing or owning arms.” Reality was quite the contrary, as I have documented in my 1989 book “A Right to Bear Arms” and in a University of Dayton Law Review article, “Encroachments of the Crown on the Liberty of the Subject: Pre-Revolutionary Origins of the Second Amendment” (Fall 1989).

As British troops sailed to Boston in 1768, the Boston Gazette reported that the ministry commanded things “more grievous to the people, than any thing hitherto made known,” the first of which was “that the inhabitants of this Province are to be disarmed.” By 1774, the British were routinely conducting warrantless searches and seizures of firearms in the Boston area, leading the Gazette to exclaim that “what most irritated the people next to seizing their arms and ammunition” was the arrest of patriot political leaders. King George III ordered the seizure of any firearms imported into the colonies.

Just after the Redcoats’ attempt to seize the arms of the rebel militia at Lexington and Concord in 1775, Gen. Thomas Gage ordered all the inhabitants of Boston to turn in their arms at Faneuil Hall for temporary safekeeping. When the people complied, troops seized the firearms, never to return them. A patriot poet described Gen. Gage’s order as saying:

That whosoe’er keeps gun or pistol,

I’ll spoil the motion of his systole.

“The Declaration of Causes of Taking Up Arms” passed by the Continental Congress cited Gen. Gage’s perfidy in seizing the Bostonians’ arms. The arms seizures were a major cause of the Revolution. STEPHEN P. HALBROOK Fairfax


43 posted on 12/15/2020 8:44:11 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WTanner1776

The words of the Texas Declaration of Independence ring loud.

“It has demanded us to deliver up our arms, which are essential to our defence, the rightful property of freemen, and formidable only to tyrannical governments.”


45 posted on 12/15/2020 8:50:08 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson