RE: What EXACTLY do you need to see? Are depositions signed under oath not good enough?
The problem with sworn testimonies is some of these people can and DO LIE.
SEE Post #22 of this thread as one instance that discredits one of Sidney Powell’s witness.
“The problem with sworn testimonies is some of these people can and DO LIE.
SEE Post #22 of this thread as one instance that discredits one of Sidney Powell’s witness.”
Sorry I don’t agree that one exaggerating their past has much to do with what they experienced recently re this election.
You seem to want Dominion or Smartmatic to admit to the fraud and that will not happen. A Judge in Wi allowed a forensic examination of 22 Dominion voting machines and when the results were given to him he promptly had them sealed. Give me ONE reason this would happen? If the results showed no fraud or discrepancies the Judge would gleefully release them to show all was well and the media would have had a field day with it.
So tell me, why were the findings sealed?
Don't get me wrong. I'm a math guy with a heavy background in statistics. I believe that, beyond a reasonable doubt, far beyond, there was widespread fraud.
But I find the apparent lack of conspirators who have come forward and confessed, perhaps unintentionally because they were celebrating too hard, difficult to understand.
ML/NJ