Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi Defends Swalwell’s Chinese Spy Scandal – Then Deflects by Saying QAnon is a Danger to Congress
GP ^ | 12/10/20 | Cristina Laila

Posted on 12/10/2020 10:40:14 AM PST by Enlightened1

GOP Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy this week said Democrat Rep Eric Swalwell should be removed from the House Intel Committee and ultimately removed from Congress over his ties to Chinese Communist spy and honeypot Fang Fang.

Earlier this week Axios reported that a Chinese spy raised money for Democrat Rep. Eric Swalwell (CA) and planted an “intern” in his congressional office.

A Chinese national named Fang Fang, AKA, Christine Fang targeted politicians in California between 2011 and 2015 at the direction of China’s internal spy agency and even had intimate relationships with two Midwestern mayors.

Fang was a “bundler” for Eric Swalwell and other Democrat candidates but it is also believed the Chinese spy and honeypot had an intimate relationship with Swalwell.

When asked if Swalwell had an intimate relationship with honeypot and spy Christine Fang, Swalwell’s office replied they couldn’t comment because that information could be “classified.”

Pelosi appointed Swalwell to the House Intel Committee so McCarthy asked what did Pelosi know about the Chinese spy scandal when she put Swalwell on a committee with access to classified information.

House Speaker Pelosi got very testy with a reporter on Thursday when asked if she was briefed on the Swalwell Chinese spy scandal.

Pelosi deflected by claiming QAnon is a danger to Congress.

‘McCarthy has QAnon in his delegation over there and that I think is a danger in terms of our debate here about what the possibilities are for undue influence to members of Congress,” Pelosi said referring to Marjorie Taylor Greene.

According to Pelosi, an incoming member of Congress who reads threads from an anonymous internet poster is a bigger danger to Congress than Swalwell, who is likely being blackmailed by a Chinese spy.

Perhaps Pelosi is also implicated in this scandal?

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: chinesespy; pelosi; qanon; swalwell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Enlightened1

How did Feinstein get a pass?


21 posted on 12/10/2020 11:08:34 AM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

And what about Diane Feinstein’s Chinese spy aid who fled the country? And good old Hunter and the whole Biden clan? The Democrats love the Chicoms.


22 posted on 12/10/2020 11:09:21 AM PST by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
QAnon is a danger to Congress.

Lord help her if 4chan ever jumped out of a kitchen cabinet and frightened her to death.   How can anyone on the face of the earth be that stupid?

23 posted on 12/10/2020 11:13:59 AM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Who was it that mentioned Q?


24 posted on 12/10/2020 11:14:09 AM PST by semaj (Death to Traitors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
QAnon is of little interest to the vast majority of conservatives, and - to my knowledge - has not been linked to a wave of violence or lawbreaking, yet in the past two months it has become another left-wing talking point - somewhat displacing Russia Russia - to scare people about some largely mythical wave of right-wing extremism.

Meanwhile, out in Portland, we have another example of a left-wing group taking over an entire neighborhood, and NO ONE in the MSM or Democrat Party - even if they make passing references to BLM or Antifa - is linking what they are doing to "rhetoric" or any sinister or subversive left-wing group or "conspiracy-theory" that the public should be alarmed about.
25 posted on 12/10/2020 11:16:34 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

It’s only about innocent Kung Pao Sex.


26 posted on 12/10/2020 11:19:42 AM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Hi.

In the fwiw department, the democrats, liberal, progressive socialists are getting angry and crazy. Not good emotions/mindset to develop orders of battle.

Wait till they get a load of a SCOTUS ruling they don’t like.

Might be time to lock and load, rock and roll.

5.56mm


27 posted on 12/10/2020 11:31:05 AM PST by M Kehoe (DRAIN THE SWAMP! Finish THE WALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Why would she take Swalwell out of the House Intel Committee..he is totally qualified due to his corruptness.


28 posted on 12/10/2020 11:35:28 AM PST by Leep (Save America. Lock down Joe Biden!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
QAnon is a THREAT to Congress, not a danger.

There's a difference.

29 posted on 12/10/2020 11:37:56 AM PST by cincinnati65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

The name is pronounced Fawng. Like a baby deer with a g on the end.


30 posted on 12/10/2020 11:54:28 AM PST by Old Yeller (Release the Kraken..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All

31 posted on 12/10/2020 12:24:42 PM PST by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Pelosi appointed Swalwell to the House Intel Committee.

She’s a China team player as many others in her party


32 posted on 12/10/2020 12:34:34 PM PST by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

Thank you. The original posted at 1800 horizontal pixels, way too big for my 1200 pixel monitor.

Check out the width=?% img modifier. Makes any image look great on any screen, even cell phones.


33 posted on 12/10/2020 12:53:34 PM PST by upchuck (When Democrats cheat in front of the whole world, what do you think they will do behind your back?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

She and anyone else involved in knowing need to be arrested immediately. There is absolutely no reason they should be free.


34 posted on 12/10/2020 1:24:02 PM PST by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
QAnon is of little interest to the vast majority of conservatives.

The dumb ones.

Was Christine Fang [FANG FANG] on the DNC payroll?https://t.co/Bv46vPCrbG pic.twitter.com/dYiwReWMho— Ron (@CodeMonkeyZ) December 10, 2020


35 posted on 12/10/2020 1:35:52 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
What's this Q anon we keep hearing about?

Does it say that maybe some of our government officials, (especially Democrats), might not be the saintly, benevolent, warm, caring, public servants, working tirelessly to help us, and the children, that we thought they were?

😱

36 posted on 12/10/2020 1:37:09 PM PST by Pajamajan ( PRAY FOR OUR NATION. I will never be a peaceful slave in a new Socialist America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa
I really wish that Qanon actually existed instead of being used as a ploy by this witch.

Your wish has come true.

I know it. Nancy knows it.

Now you know it.


37 posted on 12/10/2020 1:38:50 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
QAnon is a danger to otherwise rational people’s mental acuity, but not to Congress I think.

So you're safe.

*whew*


38 posted on 12/10/2020 1:40:31 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bagster
I'm not sure what your point is. Christine Fang got some money from the Dems - about $8,000. I'm not surprised, but that's pretty small potatoes. We did not need that list to know that Fang was involved in Democratic politics, and most of the money was probably flowing in the other direction - from her and/or her Chinese handlers to Swalwell and other Democrats. Anyway, your source is not QAnon, and my comment was about QAnon, nor was I defending Christine Fang or Eric Swalwell.

I found out about Christine Fang on the Tucker Carlson show, not from QAnon, and my comment was not really intended to disparage QAnon, but to point out (1) that it is relatively unknown to most conservatives, and it is not where most of us get our news; (2) that it looms larger in the fevered imaginations of the MSM than in the world of conservatism; and (3) that it is not - to my knowledge - a site that inspires or advocates violence or lawbreaking, even if the media tried to link it - somehow - to a grand total of ONE criminal act committed by someone who supposedly followed QAnon. It was a typical media smear job.
39 posted on 12/10/2020 2:14:53 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
I'm not sure what your point is. Christine Fang got some money from the Dems - about $8,000. I'm not surprised, but that's pretty small potatoes.

Wait. So the DNC having a known Chinese communist spy on their payroll after the CORRUPT FBI warned Swalwell about her isn't a big deal?

You're probly right.

Silly me. What was I thinking.

p.s. Q is real, and it's spectacular.


40 posted on 12/10/2020 2:22:20 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson