Posted on 12/09/2020 8:39:23 AM PST by raptor22
Noted Fox News pundit Tucker Carlson has often been none of the few bright spots on a network whose continued leftward tilt is no longer possible not to notice. For example, his commentaries on the true pandemic facts and how manufactured COVID hysteria has been used to carve out huge exceptions to our constitutional liberties have been on point. But on Thursday Tucker Carlson tested positive for bloviating stupidity in surrendering to the conventional wisdom that charges of systemic computer hacking of our elections bi pro-Biden foreign actors.
At issue is the Thursday press conference held by Team Trump attorneys Rudy Giuliani, a former U.S. attorney and New York Mayor and Sidney Powell, a former federal prosecutor and most recently Lt Gen. Michael Flynn’s attorney as he fights the deep state’s entrapment of President Trump’s former designated national. Giuliani has an unrestrained personality that can grate on you while Powell has a rather dry manner. Both are damn good layers with an encyclopedic knowledge of the rules of evidence and what constitutes a provable and winnable case. They have stellar legal records. Tucker Carlson has none yet on Thursday he claimed neither had presented any convincing evidence, particularly to him, he with no legal or courtroom experience, Tucker went further, saying that Sidney Powell had repeatedly rebuffed his requests for evidence, essentially telling him to stop bothering her and get lost.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconstitutionalconservatives.com ...
I am one that has tuned out Fox News.
Tucker lied? All he said was that Powell had refused to provide evidence to his show for her wide-ranging allegations. As recently as last night he gave time to people claiming election fraud.
Not an advocate for Tucker but he did have a point.
In order to get the courts involved, you have to show evidence of illegalit / fraud and that time was of the essence. Tucker did not say that the evidence had to be provided to him, as the MSM wants to portray. Just that there needed to be a presentation of the evidence.
Given that more limited understanding, Tucker was correct but was in essence, stating the obvious.
I also believe that dispite what the MSM wants the public to believe, evidence has been provided and the evidence is compelling.
Because he nailed the Biden's and the deep states interest in defeating Trump.
People get on each other’s nerves. No need to excommunicate everybody who has a disagreement with somebody else. Even Trump team had to explain that Powell wasn’t the president’s attorney and was doing her own thing.
This blog is referencing a news conference held on NOVEMBER 19th! A lot has happened since then. The Carlson statement about Powell was covered and tossed as far as Carlson’s bullcrap..;. long ago.
IOW this is wayyyy out of date, in re: GA illegalities and steal and all that has happened since— PROVIDING evidence.
Carlson is a tool, as see eye ehhhhh asset along with Anderson Cooper. Been known for some time.
Only Hannity, Judge Jeanine and Lou Dobbs on Fox are addressing the issue.
I can accept one or two spelling or grammatical errors in an article, as that can happen with the best editing. This thing is an unreadable hot mess. After the second glaring error in the first paragraph, I skimmed some of the remainder. That bordered on incoherence, so I withdrew.
If you want to be taken seriously, BE SERIOUS! Lousy spelling and grammar make you look less than intelligent, and that gives many of your supporters pause.
JMHO, YMMV.
We are all on the same page here. We are not grammar nazis, we are grammar libertarians, as we try to help grammar defend itself from the depredations of the illiterate. See my #29.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.