[Religion and Politics]

This has been known because of the hand recount audit where Trump picked up 74 votes in Ware County. This is not an isolated check though. Note that Favorito was able to check the machine because there were paper ballots produced by the system to allow the check and later his "forensic examination". ALL paper ballots were hand counted by Georgia separate from the machines. These are the same ballots Favorito used to confirm his result. Unfortunately, the hand counting of all the ballots in Georgia did not show a different Election outcome from the one produced by the Dominion system.

Here is a link showing the result of all the hand count differences by county. Scroll down to Ware County and you can see the +74 (37 "switched" votes). There are some standouts in the list like Floyd Co. and others where the big number were a result of operator errors during the initial counting of votes. But even when those errors were fixed, Joe Biden had more paper ballots marked for him than for Trump. That was confirmed without using the Dominion scanners or QR codes (the QR code if not properly tested by election officials can be a source of error, but not necessarily fraud).

We would be better served going after the absentee ballots as we have already hand recounted all of the paper ballots and the "fraud" just isn't there in the Dominion system. This isn't "breaking news" or "jaw dropping news". Any reasonable examination of the tabulation methods show Joe Biden had more ballots than Trump. We need to cull out the invalid ballots to have any hope in Georgia.

[MHGinTN]

ONLY a sample was hand counted. So only mirrored the initial counting, not exposing anything. It was raffie’s scam.

[lepton]

There are reports out there that suggest the ‘hand recount’ often wasn’t. That definitely needs to be clarified.

[freeandfreezing]

Ballots with QR codes have a printed list that should represent the voter's choices along with the supposedly matching QR code. For those ballots the question is if the voting machine correctly recorded what the voter entered as their choice on the printed ballot that the machine generates.

If malicious code was present in the machines that flipped some votes, or just dropped votes for one candidate, then the only way to catch that action is for voters to notice that the printed text on their ballots is incorrect. Several voters have come forward claiming that happened to them.

Researchers have found that few people verify the list of choices on their ballot, but instead just take the ballot generated by the machine and cast it.

Before this election Democrats and Republicans argued against using this type of voting machine. Now the same Democrats are claiming that the machines are foolproof.