Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Religion and Politics
Ballots with QR codes have a printed list that should represent the voter's choices along with the supposedly matching QR code. For those ballots the question is if the voting machine correctly recorded what the voter entered as their choice on the printed ballot that the machine generates.

If malicious code was present in the machines that flipped some votes, or just dropped votes for one candidate, then the only way to catch that action is for voters to notice that the printed text on their ballots is incorrect. Several voters have come forward claiming that happened to them.

Researchers have found that few people verify the list of choices on their ballot, but instead just take the ballot generated by the machine and cast it.

Before this election Democrats and Republicans argued against using this type of voting machine. Now the same Democrats are claiming that the machines are foolproof.

77 posted on 12/04/2020 9:20:25 AM PST by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: freeandfreezing
Ballots with QR codes have a printed list that should represent the voter's choices along with the supposedly matching QR code. For those ballots the question is if the voting machine correctly recorded what the voter entered as their choice on the printed ballot that the machine generates. If malicious code was present in the machines that flipped some votes, or just dropped votes for one candidate, then the only way to catch that action is for voters to notice that the printed text on their ballots is incorrect. Several voters have come forward claiming that happened to them.

Researchers have found that few people verify the list of choices on their ballot, but instead just take the ballot generated by the machine and cast it.

Before this election Democrats and Republicans argued against using this type of voting machine. Now the same Democrats are claiming that the machines are foolproof.

Getting a voting machine that had a printed ballot was by court order. Georgia used to have an all electronic system.

I know I checked my ballot and I validated that I did. I saw the Georgia Tech study that indicated it could be problematical to assume ballots are checked by the voter. What the "pure" system that is claimed is for 100% voter marked ballot vs. what Georgia has which is 100% Ballot Marking Device. Thus, the printed ballot is not directly marked upon by the voter.

For me, I am fine with the new system. My first time using it and I checked every selection and had no problems. The paper ballot I cast was later hand counted. If there was massive vote flipping or vote dropping via the QR code printed, it wasn't validated by the hand count of the ballots by the printed summary. For massive fraud, we would have seen very many instances of upset voters who were given a printed ballot without their choices represented. I hear about a few here and there, but nothing that suggests the Chicoms and Iranians were pulling levers from a server in Germany. Or have we already moved on from the Kraken?

Anyway, the issue is pretty simple as regards Georgia and the Presidential race. When you add up the paper ballots cast in the election, Biden won. We better be working on figuring out which or how many of the paper ballots are invalid. I've said it before, and I'll say it again, Dominion is a dry hole as regards the Georgia Presidential Preference outcome.

91 posted on 12/04/2020 10:39:02 AM PST by Religion and Politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson