Posted on 11/30/2020 10:22:12 AM PST by Oiao
"4 years?" The Democrats' favorite top-level strategic advisor -- George Soros -- has 30 years of real-world experience heavily financing and intensely planning exactly that kind of stuff throughout the world. Soros has been bringing his vast experience and strategic thinking to the Democrat Party Cabal and its Democrat politicians for decades.
Here's a quote from a change.org webpage: "George Soros ... is using his vast wealth and influence to foment riots and strife in the United States. He has a long history of meddling in the internal affairs of foreign countries and is using the same tactics to destabilize the United States ..."
In response to all those constant accusations against him, George Soros happily admits that in his business life, he is totally "amoral" but that in his non-business life, he "tries" to be moral. Thus, George Soros must believe that destabilizing the U.S. and wrecking its electoral process (and thus the country's very foundation) is a "moral" undertaking.
And yet, no one...even Trump (I doubt the military would fulfill his orders anyway)...has taken him and his organization out. Not one hair on his head has been mussed. Nothing. No action whatsoever.
It’s taking the initiative that wins. Not talking and complaining. People in positions of power seem to be sitting around waiting for someone, like Soros, to pay them off, not taking the initiative to end their reign of terror.
This is how civilizations collapse.
...an organized effort...
____________________________
The entire operation is sickening.
I watched the PA hearing and am now watching AZ. I am, as a FReeper, well-informed. I also watch War Room and utilize Epoch Times, Revolver and a few other aggregates. Still,I am tech-deficient and so am learning a lot from the experts.
Also learning a lot from the witnesses, even though I have watched Veritas and paid decent attention to Fitton. It is heartbreaking to watch honest citizens who give up their time for a grinding and exhaustive election watch position, struggle to describe the seemingly nonsensical, chaotic, partisan and dishonest running of the elections in large urban areas. They are obviously concerned and had never imagined things would be and are as disorganized and brutal as they are. They do not speculate, attempt to describe in painful detail and are quick to not claim to know what they didn’t personally see, hear, or experience.
I suppose it is a good thing for more and more people to experience the failure of our society under prog cultural hegemony. But the transition from being anesthetized by the formerly-normal schedule and daily experiences of middle-class and upper-middle-class American life, to being shocked awake by icy reality is painful. I remember when it happened to me and even now, while I thought I was inured to the litany of calculated failure and callous incompetence, I am disgusted and terrified at the implications for us all, for America and for the world.
Please tell me which fact I stated that you think is wrong, and I will post a link from the court docket.
“Please tell me which fact I stated that you think is wrong, and I will post a link from the court docket”
Thanks for thus response. Totally fair.
“The judge’s latest order (it’s his third on the same topic, so it’s hard to keep up) limited his TRO about Dominion machines to three counties.”
Ok.
The rest is totally made up, or perhaps a better way to say it, empty speculation:
“The State is saying they need to set up the machines for the Senate runoff, in which early voting starts in two weeks. So if machines are being moved in other counties, it’s not a violation of any court order.”
The first sentence is non-sequitur and straw-man in context of the next sentence. The second sentence is speculation.
Convoluted vague and meaningless.
“Supposedly” doesn’t work for me. Why is the video cut? What was the point of taking it, if you’re not going to follow the trucks to their destination?
The second sentence says "if," so yes, it's speculation, and clearly identified as such.
They ignored Alito's order in PA.
They are lawless.
“That the state said that is documentable, if you want to make me dig through the court papers to find it.”
My comment was “ok”. Why would you think I challenged you and you’d need to document.
“The second sentence says “if,” so yes, it’s speculation, and clearly identified as such.”
That was my point. You were just making up stuff.
If doesn’t do much. One can use if and say anything.
What if Trump grows 100 feet tall and shoots lasers from his eyes?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.