Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kentucky Man's Decision to Livestream Cops Making an Arrest Was a Bad Idea; Spoiler: 'Solid Left Hook'
Red State.com ^ | November 28, 2020 | Mike Miller

Posted on 11/28/2020 11:12:11 AM PST by Kaslin

On today’s episode of “Hold My Beer and Watch This!”, a Kentucky man on his way home from work last week saw several police cars with lights flashing surround a vehicle in a McDonald’s parking lot. As he approached the scene, he parked his car about 50 feet away, pulled out his phone, and decided to film whatever happened next.

Joe Bennett told Spectrum News 1 in Louisville he immediately thought of videos he had seen this year from around the country in which police actions ended badly. In the Facebook livestream, which was also linked to Twitter, Bennett can be heard saying he was “doing [his] due diligence as a citizen” by documenting the arrest.

At least one of the suspects in the surrounded car was black.

“I just wanted to observe, so I tried to give them distance,” he said, adding at one point: This might be the most boring video ever.” “I’m trying to stay away so I don’t get involved,” he reiterated. “I ain’t trying to piss off the police, or nothin’, I’m just watchin’.

About two minutes after Bennett began filming, the video got “un-boring” in a hurry.

When the officers realized they were being filmed, two approached Bennett; posthaste, as it were. When one of the officers asked to see his ID, Bennett refused to provide it (bad idea). “You’re filming a crime scene investigation… and you’re involved,” the cop explained.

Joe Bennett stopped to film Jeffersontown Police as they surrounded a car. He said he was doing his “due diligence as a citizen.”

Then one of the officers walked across the parking lot and punched him. pic.twitter.com/xJTyJSkOd9

— Adam K. Raymond (@adamkraymond) November 27, 2020

When Bennett refused to present his ID a second time (not a good idea at all), the officer quickly tried to grab his phone. As he was attempting to force Bennett to the ground, the officer hit Bennett in the face. One of the two officers then grabbed Bennett’s phone.

Live stream over. Thanks for playing.

Bennett was issued a citation for “menacing and resisting arrest,” which described the hit as an “empty strike” – a claim Bennett refutes, saying he was hit with a “solid left hook” and had to be checked out by EMTs on the scene and by a doctor, a day later.

HotAir’s Jazz Shaw tweeted that while he supports the police, they “can’t go around punching people just because they’re filming you when you’re out on the public streets doing your job.”

Dear Police: You know I support you, but you can’t go around punching people just because they’re filming you when you’re out on the public streets doing your job.https://t.co/ZjsWrX2wzh

— Jazz Shaw (@JazzShaw) November 28, 2020

Fair enough. But “you” also can’t just go around refusing to present ID to a police officer, and you certainly can’t resist. If you believe you’re being treated unfairly, take that up with the authorities later — rather than choosing to first get your ass kicked.

According to TMZ, the citation reads

Officers were investigating a case where fraudulent checks were being cashed at a local bank. Officers were informed that there was a gray Jeep involved. Officers were told that the gray Jeep was picking up offenders after they attempted to cash the fraudulent check. This officer was informed that the above subject [Joe Bennett] at which time was standing on the side of his vehicle was the driver of the gray Jeep.

Officer approached the subject and asked him for identification. Subject refused. Officer told the subject he was named in the investigation and the subject still refused to identify himself. Officer attempted to put handcuffs on the subject before things escalated. Subject tensed up and started to pull away. Officer delivered one empty strike to the subject and took the subject to the ground.

Lt. Col. Steve Schmidt of the Jeffersontown Police Department told Spectrum 1 that one of the detained suspects pointed Bennett out — while he leaned against his Jeep and filmed from across the parking lot — as the driver involved in the alleged crime. Schmidt later said Bennett was not a suspect in the alleged check fraud scheme.

When asked if the explanation made him feel better, Bennett said:

“No, it doesn’t. [Doing] proper police work, they should have approached me gently. I wasn’t going anywhere, I wasn’t in my vehicle, I wasn’t gonna flee. They certainly shouldn’t have hit me first and asked questions later.”

Coupla thoughts.

Was it a good idea for Bennett to stop and film the incident? Particularly from just 50 feet away? Probably not, but given that at least one of the suspects was black, let alone the craziness of 2020, I get it. Would I have done it? No.

Was it a good idea for Bennett to refuse to provide his ID when asked to do so? Was it a good idea to resist? Is it ever a good idea to refuse an order from a police officer? Is it ever a good idea to resist?

Should the cop have gotten physical with Bennett? Grab the phone, sure. But deliver the “solid left hook”?

This Twitter user, who claimed to be a civil rights attorney, not only said no; he’d like to take Bennett’s “easy money” case and buy a second home with his share of the award.

I’m a civil rights defense lawyer. Put me in touch with this guy. I need a second house. This is easy money. The guy on the right? I hope his house is titled properly.

— j. galt (@Astonvillausa) November 27, 2020

I’m not a civil rights attorney and I’ve never played one on TV, but from what I could see, the “solid left hook” was questionable — given that it actually happened. You?


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: jeffersontown; lawenforcement; louisville; police; policeactions; resistingarrest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: Kaslin

Once the cops informed Bennett he’d been identified as a participant in the still unfolding crime, he was obligated to provide ID. Twice refusing to comply with that reasonable demand justifies using restraints and Bennett’s foolish subsequent physical resistance is solid grounds for the immediate application of appropriate force. The Left hook was perhaps a little over-the-top but events were still unsettled, Bennett’s resistance was ongoing, and the nosey jerk had it coming.


41 posted on 11/28/2020 2:23:39 PM PST by Knocker (Tell the truth and run like hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

I’m with you. That cop was way out of line. I’ve been very supportive of the police, but lately, given how eager they are to pounce on random civilians for the slightest thing (while letting rioters break windows) I think I’ll just step back a bit and let the politicians, the criminals, and the cops work it out between them.


42 posted on 11/28/2020 2:29:34 PM PST by A_perfect_lady (The greatest wealth is to live content with little. -Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; All
This appears to be pretty cut and dried.

It is not against the law to video tape police or LEO doing their jobs, as long as you are doing it on public property and not interfering with their job. If the property owner, in this case, McDonalds, wanted you to move off of their property, they have that right. But if you went off the property onto a public sidewalk or right of way, you can still legally film them.

And unless the police have probable cause or suspect you of committing a crime, (filming them is not a crime) then you have the right to refuse to show your ID.

This is America and you have constitutional rights just like everybody else does.

The cop in this case was way out of line and broke the law himself by assaulting the guy filming the incident. This guy has a case against the officer and the department he works for.

I'm not a lawyer and I didn't even spend the night last night in a Holiday Inn Express. But feel free to prove me wrong.

43 posted on 11/28/2020 3:01:27 PM PST by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: throwthebumsout

“Officers were informed that there was a gray Jeep involved. Officers were told that the gray Jeep was picking up offenders after they attempted to cash the fraudulent check. This officer was informed that the above subject [Joe Bennett] at which time was standing on the side of his vehicle was the driver of the gray Jeep.”

Who did this “informing,” when the officers agreed the filming guy was not a suspect, later?

It sounds like it was completely made up by the police officers to cover their butts for harassing the filming guy.


44 posted on 11/28/2020 3:27:26 PM PST by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

typical a$$hole cops that don’t want to be video taped. And the cops leadership cover & lie for them! This isn’t a rare event at all. I agree with above poster that all cops should be required to wear an active video camera at all times. The body cam should not be allowed to be turned off by the cop either.


45 posted on 11/28/2020 4:01:06 PM PST by CardeadInKy ("The problem with Liberalism is that eventually you run out of other people's money" -Marg Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson