Posted on 11/28/2020 11:12:11 AM PST by Kaslin
I see no reason for cops to punch or harass someone taking video from 50 feet away.
There is also no reason to expect the ID of such a person, either.
I agree with you on both points
Yes, you can.
and you certainly can't resist.
He didn't.
The officer by his own admission had no reason for arresting or detaining him.
I don't care if it is 2020 or 1919.
Officer is in the wrong.
This is B.S. this is how we get to a police state where people get disappeared. Cops should be video taped. In fact, body cams should be mandatory. They protect the cop from false accusations as well as protecting the rights of citizens.
Officers were informed that there was a gray Jeep involved. Officers were told that the gray Jeep was picking up offenders after they attempted to cash the fraudulent check. This officer was informed that the above subject [Joe Bennett] at which time was standing on the side of his vehicle was the driver of the gray Jeep.
Some cios get jumpy and angry when they get filmed. Some don’t. Plenty of video of both types.
Anywsy, the cops later said the citizen wasn’t a suspect. So, where was the probable cause?
Go to Youtube and check out “Police Audits”, First Amendment Audits etc. One of my favourite channels is “Audit the Audit” where the narrator rates the actions of the police and the person recording. It can be very entertaining, and it can be infuriating.
Some of the “auditors” are just trying to poke the bear, but often that bear is well-deserving of a lesson in manners, common sense, and civil behaviour.
It’s very interesting how drastically police behaviour changes when they learn their actions are being recorded.
Thank God there are a few freedom oriented Freepers left.
Really? Informed by who? I doubt it.
I would guess that the officer was “informed” by some “anonymous sources” that were invented as a convenient excuse to harass a citizen.
And dumb eager beavers like these in the police force will constantly cause grieve for the force in whole.
My wifes nephew is a cop in Detroit MI. And he personally welcomes videos taken. Why? Because they get the names and addresses of those doing the videos and use them for evidence if the case gets to that. If they wont allow for full access of the vid, they then use a warrant to get the video.
Bullshit. A cop has no right to ask you for id unless he has good reason. Bennett could have easily said “I’m just talking on my phone’’.
Louisville police are supposed to be wearing and using Go Pro cameras themselves. However, there have been instances when either on their own, or following orders, they turned off their cameras in questionable circumstances.
In worse circumstances, the shooting of Breonna Taylor, the undercover agents had such cameras and used them at events earlier that day, but said they weren’t wearing them at the time. And other officers who arrived on scene were told to turn off their cameras.
Bad cop. Or perhaps just a really, really stupid cop. Needs to lose his job and a lawsuit. Chief probably needs to go as well.
You can film cops from a distance. Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2011); Smith v. City of Cumming, 212 F. 3d 1332, (11th Cir. 2000)
I was going to say the same thing. If the guy was pointed out (incorrectly) as the driver of the suspect vehicle, then he should have been told that before being asked for ID.
I DO NOT NEED ID to stand in the street.
When the vest cams came out our Sheriff went to the council and asked for funding to get them for his deputies.
They whined over the money and he told them that it was a lot cheaper then have to settle a lawsuit.
He has total confidence in his deputies and so he did not worry about what the tapes might show. His trust has been rewarded and yes, so far there have been no successful lawsuits against his department. We are a quiet little area but we do have a heavily traveled state road running though the township. There have been incidents. The recordings always clearly show that his guys and gals are polite, appropriate and follow the rules.
“In “stop and identify” states, citizens are required to disclose their identity to the police when the officers have reasonable suspicion to believe that they may be participating in criminal activity. The United States Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of these types of statutes. However, the Kentucky Supreme Court has found that the Commonwealth of Kentucky is not a “stop and identify” state.”
https://baldanilaw.com/identify-yourself-to-kentucky-police/
“A controversial bill granting Kentucky law enforcement the ability to temporarily detain anyone who refuses to identify him or herself has been withdrawn by the sponsor, who says he was “personally threatened” after posting the bill.”
Ky. Lawmaker Drops ‘Stop-And-Identify’ Proposal, Citing Hostile Response, By JOSH JAMES • JAN 21, 2020
Most recent court decisions have backed up Americans’ right to film police and will likely do so in the future.
The officer should be charged with assault.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.