Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Fester Chugabrew

[What, in your estimation, would constitute genuine evince as opposed to unfounded assertions? Every piece of evidence is an assertion to some extent. At what point does it rise to the level of prosecution worthy? Please give an example. Thank you.]


Evidence that secures a win instead of a loss at trial. Powell has sustained numerous losses in non-political cases, including the Arthur Andersen case I cited. Her entire career seems to consist of making excuses for why she lost. In the political arena, she has met her metier - finally, a venue where losing makes her a martyr instead of just another below average attorney. Best of all, her losses can be milked for contributions from people convinced that the best is yet to come for a latter day Joan of Arc. Problem with the comparison? Joan of Arc *won*.


52 posted on 11/26/2020 5:28:03 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Zhang Fei

I was hoping for an example of satisfactory evidence, not a diatribe or rehash of history. What kind of evidence, short of what is at hand so far, will win the case? “The kind that wins” evades my question. Provide an example, please. Real time video? Digital time stamps? At some point the court must deal with substantial evidence. What do you consider to be substantial enough?


75 posted on 11/26/2020 7:07:47 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew (I'd rather have a rude President than a polite tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson