[What, in your estimation, would constitute genuine evince as opposed to unfounded assertions? Every piece of evidence is an assertion to some extent. At what point does it rise to the level of prosecution worthy? Please give an example. Thank you.]
I was hoping for an example of satisfactory evidence, not a diatribe or rehash of history. What kind of evidence, short of what is at hand so far, will win the case? “The kind that wins” evades my question. Provide an example, please. Real time video? Digital time stamps? At some point the court must deal with substantial evidence. What do you consider to be substantial enough?