"Based upon the above allegations of fraud, statutory violations, and other misconduct, as stated herein and in the attached affidavits, it is necessary to order appropriate relief,including,butnotlimitedto,enjoiningthecertificationoftheelectionresultspendingafull investigation and court hearing, ordering a recount of the election results, or voiding the election and ordering a new election, to remedy thefraud."
I kid you not. What Judge wants to read through 75 pages of, for example, 15 words all glued together in one big 100-letter word salad? Ridiculous. You'd think top attorneys would have some vague clue how to properly edit a legal filing for a district court. Scary to think those are top U.S. attorneys (including Sidney Powell and Lin Wood) who put together that document. I scanned through it fast but I'd bet if you were a Judge carefully reading that document, you'd find a ton of glaring mistakes, typo's, and who knows what else.
Here's another glaring example of the amateurish nature of that document, this one in the actual title of the legal filing: "EASTERN DISTRCT OF MICHIGAN".
I kid you not. Looks like a 15-year-old wrote it. I wish they would have professionally written that document. Would have taken a high-schooler maybe 10 minutes to quickly fly through that PDF and find all the major glaring errors. Sad.
You’re a moron.
Saw that too...I am hoping its a formatting glitch from uploading it to twitter and not the actual filing.
Also saw that it is for MI, not GA.
But its a good start.
I don’t believe lawyers, as a group, are above-average people. Neither are medical, financial, military or theatrical people. Neither are politicians.
The bell curve applies to all occupations.
Fed filings go through ocr. Ocr does weird stuff to words and paragraphs. The hard copies are most likely not like that.
This is very common in legal docs, and there are reasons for this based on precedent.
Do you have experience with lawsuits?
It’s not like the attorneys are blogging or writing articles for public consumption.