More Troubling Testimony in PA Senate Hearing: 100,000 Ballots In Question, According to Witness - A former Navy Commanding Officer, a data & forensic computer scientist & an expert in security & fraud

As we reported earlier, there was stunning testimony today in the Pennsylvania state senate hearing, with witnesses detailing voting irregularities that they saw in the election.

President Donald Trump excited the hearing, calling in and thanking people for coming forward with the truth.

We reported how poll watchers were kept away from being able to actually see what was going on while hundreds of thousands of ballots were counted without real scrutiny. The strange spikes of votes for Joe Biden with hundreds of thousands of votes in 90 minutes being counted for Biden with no more than a couple of thousand for Trump in that time.

But perhaps one of the most striking testimonies was from Gregory Stenstrom. who described himself as a “former Commanding Officer in the Navy, veteran of foreign wars, CEO of my own private company, a data scientist & forensic computer scientist & an expert in security & fraud.” He laid out all the problems he had observed as a poll watcher.

Stenstrom described how USB drives went missing and that the chain of custody for drives and ballots was broken and not followed in accordance with the rules. This is some thread.

So effectively who know what was going on with all this, because no one was following any of the rules they were supposed to be following, random guy was uploading votes into the machines and 1/3 of the votes, 100,000 he claimed were in question. Yikes.

stop posting the rubbish about 1.8m mail votes. it’s been posted on almost all PA threads, and it is not true. 1.8m-plus refers to the Primaries. apparently Rudy clarified this at the hearing:

sad to say I found these links on thedonald.win
https://thedonald.win/p/11QS32RxxL/those-fuckers-printed-one-millio/c/

the exact figure - 1,823,148 - is for the Primaries:

Data PA Govt: 2020 Primary Election Mail Ballot Requests Department of State
Government Efficiency & Citizen Engagement
Updated
September 25, 2020
Data Provided by
Pennsylvania Department of State
1.82M Mail Ballot Request for 2020 Primary Election
(BOTTOM OF PAGE 1 OF CHART)
Showing Mail Ballot Request for 2020 Primary Elections 1 to 13 out of 1,823,148
https://data.pa.gov/Government-Efficiency-Citizen-Engagement/2020-Primary-Election-Mail-Ballot-Requests-Departm/853w-ecfz

18 Nov: US Elections Project: Pennsylvania Early Voting Statistics
Mail Ballots Returned: 2,629,183
Requested ballots: 3,088,123
https://electproject.github.io/Early-Vote-2020G/PA.html

it’s a pity the wrong figures have spread around, it would seem. how on earth did that happen?

when it’s suggested on thedonald.win that the thread is pulled down because it is incorrect, someone replies:

COMMENT: Nope. Not at all. Rudy Giuliani ***clarified the 1.8 Million ballots were sent during the Primaries in August and 1.4 million apparently casting their vote. He further went on to elaborate how the hell 2.5 million (now 2.6 million) got to cast their vote less than 2-3 months later for the Presidential election.
There is further no reason to delete the page containing the 1.4 million cast on the PA Website, unless they got something to hide, with Giuliani having the proof.
Thank the mods indeed with the clarification under it: “The 1,126,940 is essentially people who didn’t participate in the primary, but still voted democrat”
https://thedonald.win/p/11QS32RxxL/those-fuckers-printed-one-millio/c/

some other details that might help to clarify the numbers further.

returned:

3 Nov updated 7 Nov: In ‘Knife’s Edge’ Pennsylvania, Trump’s Fortunes Rely on His Rural Base
If President Trump is able to outperform the polls in the battleground state of Pennsylvania, it will be because he re-energized white, blue-collar voters in places like Butler County.
By Trip Gabriel and Shane Goldmacher
The Biden campaign expressed confidence that it had run up a cushion of support in early voting, after Democrats returned ***1,641,000 mail-in ballots by Tuesday morning, compared to ***586,000 that were returned by Republicans...
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/03/us/politics/pennsylvania-results-trump.html

requests:

19 Oct: NBC Philadelphia: Pennsylvania Mail-in Ballot Requests Hit 2.8 Million, Including 700,000 GOP Voters
Nearly 1.8 million voters registered as Democrats have requested mail-in ballots, more than 1 million more than Republican voters. That disparity could mean determining a winner in the battleground state may take a few days after Nov. 3.
By Brian X. McCrone and Rudy Chinchilla
Another 200,000 Pennsylvania voters have requested mail-in ballots for the Nov. 3 presidential election, and Democrats still far outnumber Republicans who have asked for one.
Even though voters registered as Democrats far outnumber Republicans who have asked for the early voting option, the overall difference shrunk slightly in the last week.

The last day to register to vote in Pennsylvania is Oct. 19. Online registration goes until 11:59 p.m. while in-person registration varies by county election office hours. HERE are all the rules, as well as other details for voters, for registering to vote.
Still, the gap between Democrats and Republicans is more than a million, a huge difference that could cause a dayslong delay in declaring a winner in one of the most important states in the Nov. 3 election...READ ALL
https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/politics/decision-2020/pennsylvania-mail-in-ballot-requests-hit-2-8-million-including-700000-gop-voters/2567670/

“I observed in the locked room in the back office 70k unopened mail in ballots. The problem was by that time the mail in ballots had already been counted. So 120k mail in counted, posted, done. My question is, where did the 70k ballots go? And nobody knows.”🔻 pic.twitter.com/UxPJR2ITYA

— Kanekoa (@KanekoaTheGreat) November 25, 2020

More information is needed about this observation. For example, how does one “look” into a room and know exactly with a “look” the number of ballots in the tens of thousands? This type of statement is actually defeating more than it is helpful without further explanation. Not saying it didn’t happen. Just saying that people are willing to accept any piece of testimony that comes across in support of Trump. It’s like the left saying “believe the woman” but Hitlary going after specific women. Need more information to corroborate the statement and bring credibility to it. What makes people think that the left is willing to steal the election that they are not above about lying when it comes into the defense of their action to taint the muddy waters. Right now I would be skeptical of all unsubstantiated claims. This one statement just seems wrong to me on the surface. Now if that person said the ballots were in a container that held 10K ballots each and there were seven containers, then maybe it would be more believable than being able to say they “looked” and saw tens of thousands of ballots that were not counted.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.