Posted on 11/25/2020 4:30:50 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
The link leads to a 40-page Scribd document by several noted mathematicians who studied the Pennsylvania election. They found several critical abnormalities that ALL benefit Biden. The total number of suspicious votes is over 300,000. More than enough to swing the election to Trump.
Because it's a Scribd document, I cannot cut and paste. Sorry.
(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...
This scientific analysis of the reported Pennsylvania (PA) 2020 Presidential voting results, is a non-partisan effort by unpaid citizens and volunteer experts. Our only objective is to play a small roll in helping assure that all legal PA votes are counted, and that only legal PA votes are counted.
We feel that the best way to do this is to start by putting ourselves in the shoes of bad actors and then considering how they might go about changing the wishes of PA citizens, into a different result. Some of the actions they might take are:
1 - Keep ineligible people (e.g. deceased, moved, etc.) on the voting roles.
(This would disguise actual voter participation rates, allow fabricated votes to be submitted in their names, etc.)
2 - Get legislation passed that did not require in-person voter identification.
(This would make it easier for non-citizens, felons, etc. to vote.)
3 - Encourage a much higher percentage of voting by mail.
(This would make it much easier to manipulate, as in-person checking is a more secure way to keep track of actual registered citizens, etc.)
4 - Discard envelopes and other identifying materials from mail-in votes.
(This makes it very hard to check for duplications, etc.)
5 - Count mail-in votes without careful signature or registration verification.
(This makes mail-in an easier choice for manipulators.)
6 - Allow votes to count that are received after Election day.
(This can direct where mail-in votes are needed to go.)
7 - Stop vote counting for several hours before the final tabulations.
(This allows for an assessment of how many votes are “needed” etc.)
8 - Do not allow genuine oversight of voting tabulation.
(This would make it easier to lose or miscalculate actual votes.)
9 - Connect voting machines or precincts to the Internet.
(This makes it quite easy for third parties to access and change votes.)
10-Distribute manipulations over multiple counties.
(This makes the adjustments more difficult to find.)
11-Use multiple tactics to make manipulations.
(This also makes the changes more difficult to find.)
12-Make most of the manipulations in unexpected districts.
(In other words don’t do as much manipulation where it’s expected.
I agree. My own analysis produced 200,000 suspicious votes 2 weeks ago.
But now you need to confirm those suspicions by presenting at least 300,000 FORGED SIGNATURES on live voter rolls and mail-in ballot envelopes in 3 states or you have nothing but suspicions.
Disagree. Circumstantial evidence is evidence, and it can be compelling evidence.
This is particularly true where the fraudsters have deprived those challenging the vote from the means of obtaining direct evidence, such as by discarding ballot envelopes containing signatures.
The judges will not overturn this election on circumstantial evidence. That is just a fact of life we have to deal with.
I still believe physical evidence exists. Start with one state: say just 12,000 forged signatures in Georgia.
Then you would see the nation stop and hold its breath while all 50 states and DC do a thorough audit.
An audit needs to happen regardless. The fraud must be exposed.
Very good statistical analysis and nonpartisan recommendations.
Well worth spending some time reading if you can wrap your head around graphs and data
Same site has links to affidavits. I dowloaded, took screenshot of 14/234 on my FB page and chided the fact “chuckers” who claim “no evidence.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.