Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Situation is Not Hopeless In Pennsylvania After Dismissal of the Case Filed There
Red State.com ^ | November 22, 2020 | Shipwreckedcrew

Posted on 11/22/2020 10:05:08 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 11/22/2020 10:05:08 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Interesting synopsis for those hating on Republican Judge Brann

Trump’s lawyers made a mess of it.

Maybe someone can get it back on track.

And for pete’s sake...delve into the severability issue.


2 posted on 11/22/2020 10:09:58 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Back in the fall of 2015 the Republican State Committee Establishment resisted a Trump takeover and a compromise was reached so that a Trump person would run the campaign effort while the old Tom Ridge Republicans would still run the state committee.

I wonder how that fits into the situation that unfolded in the state with results showing the GOP candidates for State Treasurer and Auditor General winning while the Dems win for President and Attorney General.


3 posted on 11/22/2020 10:11:52 AM PST by Nextrush (FREEDOM IS EVERYBODYS BUSINESS, REMEMBER PASTOR NIEMOLLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

everything they are bringing before the courts is talking about technicalities.

but nearly everything they are saying to the press is about voting machine software switching millions of votes.

I am honestly getting a little confused.


4 posted on 11/22/2020 10:11:59 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

A Republican judge nominated by Barack Obama.


5 posted on 11/22/2020 10:13:59 AM PST by Nextrush (FREEDOM IS EVERYBODYS BUSINESS, REMEMBER PASTOR NIEMOLLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Because technicalities are Con Law questions..and Con Law is how you have to win this case before Biden is certified.

Wild accusations that sound like crazy conspiracy theories (even if they may be true) will not keep Biden from being certified.

The wild theories are for the court of public opinion...and investigations, hearings, etc.

And in my opinion- from my time of having watched Trump over the years..the technical aspect will bore him. He likes the “story”...not the Con Law nitty gritty details


6 posted on 11/22/2020 10:19:24 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush

As part of a horse trade deal...not because Obama would have nominated him otherwise.


7 posted on 11/22/2020 10:20:06 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

and btw, Con Law nitty gritty details are not as interesting as a “story”.

That is part of it as well. Public eyes glaze over talking about Con Law issues.


8 posted on 11/22/2020 10:23:25 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Judges and our legal system operate on technicalities; the idiot American brain operates on the sensational. Only the former matters, luckily.

If the average American understood the Constitution, wrapping everything up in a neat little Equal Protection package would be possible and the outcome obvious because “the rules are the rules” and the rules were shattered everywhere on/before/after Nov 3. But they don’t so the sensational is leading the day.

What is bothering me is how they’re going to make a logical link between Dominion CRIMINAL activity, which I think is very real and very large, and Constitutional violations. If they can prove Dominion software was programmed to give Biden 1.25 votes and Trump only 0.75 votes, that would seem to violate 1 person, 1 vote. Other ideas for how to tie the sensational Dominion stuff with the on-going (and necessary) technical legal arguments?


9 posted on 11/22/2020 10:31:12 AM PST by SelfhatingMillennial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
If this is the case I think it is, the judge refused the case because Trump's lawyers were asking for 7 million votes to be tossed out and he did not feel that there was sufficient evidence for this.
When I read that this AM I thought 'what is wrong with them? They had to know he would toss it'. But...
By demanding an outrageous solution / restitution they knew the judge would refuse it and they are one step closer to SCOTUS that much sooner.
Trump is no dummy and he surrounds himself with smart people. Think outside the box people.
He has been 3 steps ahead of the dimocrats all along. He knew this election would be rigged and started planning his counterattack years ago.
10 posted on 11/22/2020 10:35:43 AM PST by Semper Vigilantis (On the 6th day God made Texas. And it was perfect. So he stopped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SelfhatingMillennial

Explain why the recount matched in Georgia if there was fractional voting. Not checking signatures was fraudulent. But recounting the vote and coming up with the same number is not a good support of the fractional theory.

I would love to be told that this is wrong or doesn’t matter. Or they didn’t apply it in Georgia for some reason


11 posted on 11/22/2020 10:43:13 AM PST by dp0622 (Tried a coup, a fake tax story, tramp slander, Russia nonsense, impeachment and a virus. They lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Semper Vigilantis

I suppose. But given the chaotic happenings with the lawyers I am going with incompetence. Although, new lawyers perhaps should not be pinned for it since they were new on the job.

Lets see if the next filing at least addresses severability and the creative solution the court used to try to get around it.


12 posted on 11/22/2020 10:43:52 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Semper Vigilantis

OTOH, it seems like the titles of the encouraging articles have been moving from “everything is wonderful and moving right on schedule” to be more like “it’s not necessarily hopeless”.


13 posted on 11/22/2020 10:46:03 AM PST by CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC ("May You Live in Interesting Times": Ancient Chinese Curse. The Wuhanic Plague: Modern Chinese Curse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SelfhatingMillennial

What is bothering me is how they’re going to make a logical link between Dominion CRIMINAL activity, which I think is very real and very large, and Constitutional violations.

*************

That confuses/concerns me as well. It seems there is a two pronged attack by Trump’s legal team but I don’t understand how they can relate or unify the two. Of course there’s the court of public opinion too and I suppose they are playing to that as well. But its complicated business and difficult to see how it might play out.


14 posted on 11/22/2020 10:47:35 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

My eyes certainly glazed over trying to read and understand all that.


15 posted on 11/22/2020 10:53:58 AM PST by A_perfect_lady (The greatest wealth is to live content with little. -Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Semper Vigilantis

By demanding an outrageous solution / restitution they knew the judge would refuse it and they are one step closer to SCOTUS that much sooner.

************

The legal team has a monumental task of trying to simultaneously and quickly digest and analyze evidence from several different states — under looming time constraints. Moreover, according to Powell they are being swamped with addition information flowing in all the time. Laying the groundwork for legal progress under the circumstances must be frustratingly difficult.

I hope there’s a grand plan that somehow ties it all together in the end.


16 posted on 11/22/2020 10:54:43 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

Exactly.

Overturning this election is going to depend on those boring details

The shiny object of Election Fraud isn’t going to do it.

I really really hope someone is working on those boring nitty gritty Con Law details


17 posted on 11/22/2020 10:58:21 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Right now this is war

WAR

The first casualty of war is the truth

Right now the primary misinformation disinformation campaign by the leftist media the Democrats and all of the Republicans in name only is to state that none of these cases will go anywhere until obviously highlight any and all cases that are dismissed as being the end of this it’s over go home take your ball

Just remember the Armistad project at the Thomas more law center just filed or six state suit yesterday

Most of the actual Trump teams seats have not even been filed yet they are still gathering evidence

What we have is a bunch of yahoo wanna be attorney is filing suits and getting rejected and that means nothing

Right now we’re on our side we have a lot of yours oh it’s over oh let’s go home

Do yourself a favor and ignore them

The big picture here is to fold

We need to overturn the results of this election and Donald Trump needs to convincingly be shown to have won the presidency

The second and more important point is going forward we need to end and I mean and all of the Democrats cannery cheating and methods that they use which are interwoven in our voting system unfortunately so that they could never ever be used again or at least minimized


18 posted on 11/22/2020 11:06:52 AM PST by Truthoverpower (The guv-mint you get is the Trump winning express ! Yea haw ! Trump Pence II! Save America again )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

ducking the 5 claims allows the ducked claims to be brought in a new lawsuit from new plaintiffs so long as the suit is timely. i would imagine that timeliness in this situation might include the prospective side effect of delaying the transmittal of results to the state legislatures, or equivalent. i am not a lawyer. what am i missing?


19 posted on 11/22/2020 11:21:48 AM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Here's a question: According to census.gov, in 2018 the US only had 153M registered voters. (I can't find a number for how many we had going in Nov 3 2020).

The popular vote for Trump and Biden adds up to... 153M. Either a LOT of people registered in the last 2 years, or we had 100% turn out which is as suspicious as all get out. What do you think?

20 posted on 11/22/2020 11:23:40 AM PST by A_perfect_lady (The greatest wealth is to live content with little. -Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson