Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: nonsporting

As I understand, all the voting machines in Georgia are of the BMD type which means the voter enters their vote through and electronic device which then prints out their vote. This “ballot” is then fed into a reader. I’m not sure if the vote tally is done from the entry device or if it is done on the actual printed ballot. But basically the machine could print one result on the ballot in text that agrees with the voter and then the machine can print out a barcode or QR code that is actually read by the reader that indicates a different count. Then when that ballot is put through any machine, it would count up the same every time and the voter would be none-the-wiser.

I’m not really sure how this is handled but I have hear that the BMD machines are very hackable.

You can read this analysis done by a Berkley student that talks about the BMD machines in great detail and how they can be unverifiable:

https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/bmd-p19.pdf


37 posted on 11/21/2020 4:38:07 PM PST by visually_augmented (I was blind, but now I see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: visually_augmented

Does the voter ever get to see the generated paper ballot to determine if it accurately reflects his choices?

If the choices are encoded in a non-readable form, there is no way to determine if this encoded string (bar code) is correct. But a manual recount would not read this encoding.

The only way I see the fraud occurring in light of possible recounts is if the generated paper artifact reflects the altered ballot.


38 posted on 11/21/2020 5:02:01 PM PST by nonsporting (For to me to live is Christ and to die is gain. Philippians 1:21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson