Posted on 11/18/2020 3:59:21 PM PST by TigerClaws
Trump Recount Committee staffer tells Newsmax the server raid was real and raw data showed different.
Go into video at 2:30.
To me that’d be “Kraken-level” event — the actual severs.
What about this?
Why does a ‘ballot counting machine’ need ink?
https://thedonald.win/p/11QRasDts9/coincidence-im-sure/c/
I've wondered if Scytl and/or Dominion are "commercial store fronts" for CIA operations.
Why disrespect the good guys, aren’t there enough democrats around for you to badmouth?
If it’s real it’s pretty incriminating. They NEED to se markers on election day (when Trump voters are sure to turnout) but they can use ballpoint pens up until then (while Biden voters are dominant).
I’d prosecute that.
If real, no doubt someone has a bcc copy.
Not this fake crap again. Sigh.
The people who own the servers say they weren’t seized. It’s BS.
don’t be a dope.
I want to know her plausible reasoning for this. It makes no sense. I was reading something about bleed through but never really understood it. Sharpies would seem to be more of a bleed through
The people that someone suggested owned the servers that someone claimed were seized say their servers weren’t seized.
Who are “the people who own the servers” who say they weren’t seized? It may not be THOSE servers that were seized.
“They’re real and spectacular”
Are you referring to the ear rings or the lips?
“I want to know her plausible reasoning for this. It makes no sense. I was reading something about bleed through but never really understood it. Sharpies would seem to be more of a bleed through”
Read my earlier post. The one where I say I’d prosecute.
Sharpies are “wet” compared to ballpoint pens, and bleed-through is an issue. It fouls the ballot, especially if it is two-sided. But even a one-sided ballot would potentially be sloppy enough to be rejected.
it’s also possible that the Trump team had this rather low level dude say it, just to make the left squirm....we can do psy ops too
Maybe this explains the civilian ops now reporting directly to DOD.
I am not conveying myself correctly
I understand that version of bleed thru
I saw something about the excuse for using sharpies was that THEY SHOULD BE USED and it had to do with bleed thru and it made no sense to me. They said it dried quickly versus ink but bleed thru was no problem.
Nor can I understand where her plausible excuse would be.
The only one I can think of is that with mail in ballots the ink has time to dry and in person it doesnt
None of it makes sense
The interesting thing is that he’s talking about the data that’s on the server. Sounds like there is a server, with data, that they actually have.
btw, I am NOT talking about why she did it...or why you think she did it.
I am talking about a plausible reason why she did it.
we are at a point where to much is impossible to verify a bunch of stuff being put out.
This could be what makes Lawyer Lin Wood so confident.
Can I volunteer to do a “fact check”???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.