Posted on 11/18/2020 1:43:13 PM PST by Enlightened1
We’ve reported on multiple incidents of ‘glitches’ that people observed related to the 2020 Presidential Election. These incidents seem odd and so we sought out and found a data set from the 2020 Presidential election. A group of IT patriots analyzed a data set of election vote data and found millions of votes in the election that were either lost or transferred from President Trump to Joe Biden. We reported this and our post was retweeted by the President.
Then in Pennsylvania we identified a strange pattern in vote percentages between President Trump’s Election Day votes and his mail-in votes that was basically impossible and suggested fraud:
Then we reported on a pattern from a few select counties in Michigan that were consistent but made no sense other than to indicate fraud. Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai using his approach identified 138,000 votes transferred from Trump to Biden in his study:
Tonight we can report we found the exact same virtually impossible activity in Georgia and Michigan.
In Georgia President Trump was up by as much as a 57% to Biden’s 42% and with 50% of the votes counted Trump was still way ahead. Then Biden was allocated batches of votes for hours, some with negative Trump votes and then with 89% of the votes in, Biden took the lead. From that point on for the next 53 batches of votes counted, for EVERY SINGLE vote batch the batches had exactly a 50.05% to 49.95% victory margin for Biden and Trump cementing Biden’s lead.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
My guess, initially predetermined, based on internal polling, and state vote predictions. Then adjusted from base value to match votes coming in. It doesn't have to be perfect each batch, due to rounding error, just close enough.
“Circumstantial. Won’t get it done.”
___________________
I don’t think so. A quick search for a definition of “circumstantial evidence” provides this:
“Circumstantial evidence is evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact—such as a fingerprint at the scene of a crime. By contrast, direct evidence supports the truth of an assertion directly—i.e., without need for any additional evidence or inference.”
Here, the entire issue comes down to mathematics. Math is not subjective but deals in absolutes. Counting the votes and mathematically analyzing them does not result in inference but in direct evidence. A mathematical impossibility is a fingerprint of wrongdoing.
I am also getting DAMN SICK TO DEATH of the nay sayers here, they need to jump on over to twitter and be with their friends!!!
Mark Steyn to Powell: “And you have evidence of this? Witnesses to this?”
Sidney Powell: “I do, indeed.”
Unfortunately, the evidence and witness both Sidney and Rudy seem to be talking about is a guy who can swear that the software was designed to switch votes and he saw that happen in Venezuela.
That is not evidence of or a witness to what happened anywhere in the united states. Despite the fact that mathematicians can swear to the statistical improbability of what happened after the counting stopped in critical states, I’m not hearing anything from Sidney, Rudy or Lin Wood that suggests witnesses to machines switching votes in the U.S.
You will never convince ME that massive fraud did not occur, but what has been discussed as “evidence” sounds pretty thin.
Sorry. Is not just a fingerprint.
Interesting observation, ty.
Romney had to know of voter fraud as he had Bain Capital ties to voting machines and/or software. Hmm...
No, it did not have to be exactly the same, but the data in the columns giving batch percentages for Dems and Repubs respectively is exactly the same (for the Georgia table Biden 50.051%, Trump 49.949%). A computer program does not happen to write 50.051% when the true number is 50.000%. That is not rounding off error - that is an ERROR, plain and simple.
So, either this program is really, really bad, or the vote numbers were determined from the ratio, instead of the ratio calculated from the vote numbers.
That is A CLEAR INDICATION OF FRAUD!
I thought I saw a piece on OAN that said they were set to try it in 2016 but the two people that were supposed to set it up backed out from fear of being caught. Ended up costing her.
There are cowards and slackers on every battlefield...
:-)
Romney wasn’t IN office though, so he didn’t have the Presidential type assets to defend his campaign. The sitting President Trump has the entire govt and military at his disposal to protect the integrity of the nation. And I’m very sure now he did, he telegraphed that today with that one tweet.
There’s a mountain of evidence to be released, it’s so massive that it’s been a 4 year job. Barr will be vindicated, probably Sessions too. The worlds biggest investigation is just about ready to be revealed. It’s not just about our country either.
But you can find plenty of people here saying we will slaughter them in 2022. Brainwashed cucks.
Trump indeed does have the proof.
The Venezuelan example is meant to explain how it works. Then everyone will say “but THAT is Venezuela (like you’re doing)”
Oh, ok... so how about this?... (evidence recorded during election that the exact same thing was done here on election night)
Trump has known about this illegal vote tampering since at least 2012, today he retweeted that fact. As if he’s so stupid that he’d let some hack electronic crap firm like Dominion steal his election? No.
So, what are we waiting for? I don’t know yet, but I assume the idea is to entrap as many traitors and conspirators as possible.
Trump, he’s still running the country right? Does he look like he’s packing his bags? He can play this game for a while longer as he sees it, at his discretion. Supposedly, Biden’s going to be the Turkey of Thanksgiving according to some rumors. We’ll see.
Starting to wonder if these corrupt people know they are going to get caught, so they are going to let the recounts happen and let it flip some of the states and re-elect Trump. They can then blame those dang computers for the “glitch”. Just say oh well it’s been straightened out and we will be changing to a different software and not using this again. Kind of a nothing else to see here so move along. Figuring maybe then they will drop investigations into the people and they get to keep those cushy jobs and stay out of jail. I am likely just dreaming...Lol. If that happened I don’t think Trump will let it go at that and I wouldn’t blame him.
Right focus, wrong question:
WHO DIRECTED the vote counts to stop ?
And, who directed them to stop them ?
The universe of people with the access... and the ability to coordinate at that level is VANISHINGLY SMALL...
WHO ARE THEY ?
A good question for the lawyers...
What law empowers ANYONE to “STOP an election” ?
Otherwise... who was it that DID stop the elections ?
Who gave the orders to stop counting ?
Do not rely on the DOJ to provide “help”...
They will not.
Reality in the requirement... is that the evidence required will have to come from OTHER sources.
Go find it...
This is why FR exists .
Wouldn’t the NSA have phone records on this “coordination”? Or are they also part of the alpha-agency problem?
Posted where ?
I used to wonder where they got the numbers that Biden was winning by 17%
I suspect it was actually Trump, and they thought they would say it the other way around to make it look bad for Trump.
If they had said t was close that would have been realistic. But to say he’s up by 17% and then try to pass of numbers showing 1% lead election day sends up red flags all over.
But you can have all the red flags you like- they don’t matter in court. We need a whistle-blower who does NOT want to go to jail.
Just one. Then the dominoes will start to fall.
We just need to make sure they all know criminal charges are coming and only the first one gets the best deal
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.