Trump had better have more than testimony that the software was DESIGNED to rig elections. He needs evidence that it was USED to rig this election.
And that proof needs to be so solid and presented in a way that even a Supreme Court judge cannot deny that the fraud happened and proves that the number of fraudulent votes is sufficient to change the results of the election in each state.
This is the only path to a Trump victory. And right now I see nothing but talk about this. Where is the team of computer and network wizards that it takes to pull this off?
Not a peep.
Not a peep.
This is what I’ve heard from the Biden campaign.
It’s something that I find very interesting.
I have great Faith in Sydney.....and I can’t believe she would state this as such an absolute thing if she couldn’t deliver....?? RIght?
The Trump legal team doesnâÂÂt have to prove the voting machines WERE manipulated, only that they COULD BE. Any judge in that situation would recognize the implications of using vote counting systems that are subject to manipulation #Election2020results— Dinesh D'Souza (@DineshDSouza) November 14, 2020
You’ve got a point. First they have to prove that the software “can” change a vote. That’s where they will hire software experts to testify. There are rumors that there are 3 whistleblowers helping Trump’s team. Maybe one of these whistleblowers is a software expert.
Second they must have evidence that votes were changed during the 2020 elections. Trump’s team needs evidence from local districts of Trump suddenly losing votes during updates. I’ve heard rumors about this but they need to show evidence that at certain times Trump’s vote count decreased.
Third is that the number of votes changed was big enough to affect the result of the election. I think it will likely depend on not only the machine changing in-person votes but also include evidence about mail-in ballots suddenly appearing for Joe Biden at 2 am on the morning of November 4, 2020 (the day after the election).