Posted on 11/14/2020 12:07:46 PM PST by bitt
Interesting...
As to the premise of this article, I have no opinion, but I think people have this backwards because they make the false assumption that an election was actually held. I argue it wasn't.
We all know what an election is. It is a covenant between a group of folks to agree to chose someone from time to time, to manage their affairs. It generally has the from that 1.) Candidates present themselves seeking 2.) an office, 3.) at the date and time set, 4.) those entitled to vote, 5.) cast a secret vote 7.) which is collect by the agent assigned to receive and count the vote and 8.)The votes are counted, all of them, equally, with no eligible vote being dismissed and no ineligible vote being counted, and 8.) the tally is presented so that it is evident, 9. according to the rules of voting for that office 10. Who the winner is.
When those steps happen everyone agrees it was an election. Minor irregularities are normal, and are disposed of not just by election officials, but by all the eligible voters to determine if the discrepancy would have affected the outcome. If it wouldn't then all are satisfied a valid election happened, even if they are disappointed with the outcome.
But suppose the rules are substantively breached through fraud or substantial mistake to violate some part of the normal order of business of selecting said representative. At that point the sacred covenant between the electors, the voters, is breached. It ceases to be an election. A contract formed under fraud or mistake is not a contract and can be set aside as if it never existed. Remember, the agreement is between the voters, and each voter has a right to an equal say with other eligible voters in a fair process. The candidate is actually irrelevant. Donald Trump as candidate has less standing in my eyes than does voting citizen in Gorgia Lynn Wood. Official Donald Trump running the whole place where the election took place having substantial knowledge of a jiggered election effecting the rights of the voters is sort of a witness to the contest between voters, which makes him a party, but aggrieved voters are probably essential parties.
So you are looking for a remedy before December 14th for an election that didn't actually happen even though we went through the motions. And I think that is the problem. What is the state of affairs if the constitutional predicate, election day, never happened. The equitable solution is to restore the rule of law and hold a fair election, maintaining the status quo until that happens.
To appear before the Supreme Court the plaintiffs cannot simply provide thousands of idiosyncratic efforts to steal votes. If there has been a major effort to impact the 2000 election the Republican lawyers will have to prove it. And that my friend takes time and the compilation of evidence that cannon be gainsaid. Patience is a virtue. If a nothingburger awaits us all, we’ll know soon enough.
Yep.
Maybe I’ll go to Austria or Switzerland.
Maybe Panama or Costa Rica.
Wake me when when the revolution is over Starts!.
You cannot make this stuff up.
Rep Gohmert today said his communication with the president re sytle was not on a secure line and before the President could act, the servers (from the private company in Germany) were confiscated by what he was told was the Army. He explained that these servers will likely never see the light of day.
On a news show on OANN replay today, retired kansas AG Philip Kline was interviewed. Among the things he alleged was that zuckerberg funded a get out the vote campaign which in turn paid the salaries of multiple (iirc at least two?) election justices in Pennsylvania (philadelphia?). I dunno (but if true that sounds just plain wrong).
Thanks for the insight.
The source link will be added to the tickle file for future use; unaware this site existed.
Post #29 has the link to the EO from WH.gov
That such an EO was written is certainly NOT the case as the link clearly shows a copy of such. Why else would it be written other than its stated intentions? Several persons have come forward regarding election night with a number of unbelievable tales. (IE - ballots with watermarks used for tracking purposes)This due to the fact FBI was not involved, but rather, Homeland Security carried out the mission.
We’ll keep digging. Perseverance pays when we actually find answers rather than tepid water.
Its over
Thats all you have been saying. Get the hell off these threads and curl up somewhere. There are a lot on here that have not given up!
This is their best PR angle, and they need to start blasting it ASAP.
Find every snippet of the talking heads using that exact phrase on the last several years, and play it on repeat.
That, along with the multiple videos showing votes being lost off the board for Trump that were broadcast live on CNN.
Use their own voices, and own videos against them. Gives them nowhere to hide.
LOL but I bet he voted!
Kinda new around here.
Well Barr can't seem to find any of it. </s>
Bttt.
5.56mm
Good, confiscate all their wealth and pay down the debt. Then put them all in jail for life.
LOL! got a link? That's certainly not what he has been recorded on video as saying......
I wonder if these posters who post “bombshell” all day long ever go to diners and order eggshell omelets?
Yeah, but cheesesteaks.
“so when do any of these bombshells of any sort EVER GO OFF???????????”
Never because they are shells with no bomb inside.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.