[gspurlock]

I read in the past few weeks that the referenced consent decree has been lifted in the past year or two. But, the inability for the Republican Party to engage in any efforts to restrain voter fraud has left the party a bit flat-footed in their efforts to ensure fair elections.

Basically the consent decree imposed in 1982 has left the Democrat with pretty much free reign to engage in and perfect voter fraud for nearly 40 years.

Here is a link to the original post: https://backyardfence.wordpress.com/2012/12/02/democrat-voter-fraud-and-republican-complicity/

[DIRTYSECRET]

If they get away with stealing it more power to them.

[Bulwinkle]

99.999% of people who smoke pot have never been arrested for smoking pot; just because only a tiny number of people are arrested for smoking pot doesn’t mean there aren’t millions doing it.

It is the same for vote fraud. Vote fraud is systematic!

[Major Matt Mason]

Now, I read that the Republican Party is legally prohibited from engaging any efforts to ensure voter integrity.

This is no longer in effect. The judge that kept renewing it either retired or died, and he was the only one that could keep it going.

[BookmanTheJanitor]

Until the Republicans start stuffing the hell out of the ballot boxes ...no one will really care about vote fraud.

[Major Matt Mason]

OK, just read that this is a different consent decree from the old one. The one from 1982 is definitely over with, though, so if this one is based on the older one, then I don't see how it is valid.

[oldtech]

None of this makes a lot of sense to me. To me it is saying that the Democrats have a right to commit voter/election fraud & the Republicans have no right to try to prevent it. That’s insane! Is this actually in effect? It certainly seems to be.

[kiryandil]

Here are the two links that don't work for you [I secured access to them for ya]:

Katie Pavlich tipsheet from 2012:

https://archive.vn/townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2012/11/06/un-poll-watchers-baffled-us-doesnt-require-id-to-vote-n695241

Precedential opinion from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in 2012 following an RNC appeal from the kangaroo courtroom of Peanut Boy judge "What A Dick" Dickinson Debevoise in the District of New Jersey [Dirty Dem Corruption Central]. Dickinson sat on this case like a poisonous toad for 33 years, till he croaked in 2015 at 91:

http://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/094615p.pdf