Posted on 11/10/2020 2:05:18 PM PST by Mount Athos
I saw the video on Gateway Pundit (”Glitch” Captured Live on CNN on Election Night 20,000 Votes Swapped from Trump to Biden) and decided to do some digging of my own, into a more reputable source that can verify that the glitch was indeed real, and that it affected the votes, instead of it being just a display glitch on that news channel. So I went digging into the Edison data and I found this damning evidence. As can be seen in the image, only 54 votes were added, but the ratio changed in Biden's favor by a whole 0.6%! This is proof that not only did the glitch happen, but it doesn't seem to have been reverted at all.
EDIT : BIG UPDATE, I made a script to run through the data and gather all instances where votes switched from Trump to Biden, Lost Votes means that the total amount of votes counted decreased by that amount throughout the counting. I've only done states that use Dominion Voting Systems so far.
EDIT 2: Added ALL the states, and separated by voting systems, although no state uses exclusively one system as far as I know.
Edit 3: Re-ordered the states, first by switched votes, then by lost votes.
Switched votes are votes that were taken from Trump and given to Biden.
Lost votes are voted that disappeared during the counting, from both candidates.
There might be a small overlap between Switched votes and Lost votes.
Dominion Voting Systems :
Pennsylvania : Switched : 220,883 Lost Votes : 941,248
New Jersey : Switched : 80,242 Lost Votes : 20
Florida : Switched : 21,422 Lost Votes : 456
Michigan : Switched : 20,213 Lost Votes : 21,882
New York : Switched : 18,124 Lost Votes : 623,213
Georgia : Switched : 17,407 Lost Votes : 33,574
Ohio : Switched : 14,965 Lost Votes : 5,102
Virginia : Switched : 12,163 Lost Votes : 789,023
California : Switched : 7,701 Lost Votes : 10,989
Arizona : Switched : 4,492 Lost Votes : 0
Minnesota : Switched : 2,766 Lost Votes : 195,650
Tennessee : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 0
Louisiana : Switched : 2,322 Lost Votes : 0
Illinois : Switched : 2,166 Lost Votes : 54,730
Wisconsin : Switched : 2,078 Lost Votes : 3,408
Colorado : Switched : 1,809 Lost Votes : 0
Utah : Switched : 1,627 Lost Votes : 0
New Hampshire : Switched : 973 Lost Votes : 116
Iowa : Switched : 938 Lost Votes : 477
New Mexico : Switched : 268 Lost Votes : 4,610
Missouri : Switched 0 : Lost Votes : 20,730
Nevada : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Alaska : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Washington : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Hawaii : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Kansas and Texas use Premier Election Solutions, owned by Dominion Voting Systems.
Texas : Switched : 14,954 Lost Votes : 30,557
Kansas : Switched : 1,674 Lost Votes : 2,154
Election Systems & Software :
Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50
Kentucky : Switched : 8,129 Lost Votes : 23,849
Arkansas : Switched : 3,664 Lost Votes : 20,748
South Carolina : Switched : 2,779 Lost Votes : 2,119
Montana : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 1,276
South Dakota : Switched : 1,347 Lost Votes : 1
North Dakota : Switched : 234 Lost Votes : 681
Maryland : Switched : 203 Lost Votes : 0
North Carolina : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 15
District of Columbia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Unknown Systems:
Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50
Connecticut : Switched : 3,834 Lost Votes : 272
Massachusetts : Switched : 3,613 Lost Votes : 51
Oregon : Switched 2,557 Lost Votes : 0
Alabama : Switched : 1,170 Lost Votes : 408
Mississippi : Switched : 355 Lost Votes : 0
Maine : Switched : 271 Lost Votes : 35
Rhode Island : Switched : 6 Lost Votes : 13
West Virginia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 78,300
Idaho : Switched 0 Lost Votes : 0
Oklahoma : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Indiana : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Delaware : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Vermont : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
NOTE : Lost votes are votes that disappeared, not only for Trump, but overall.
VERIFIED!!!!:
I went looking through the data I got from my script, trying to find if the moment the Antrim glitch happened in Michigan is there. And it is. Here is the Data. [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/michigan/president.json ]
And here is the specific part when the switch happened. [ https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png ]
You can see in that picture, that Trump lost 3,096 votes, those all went to Biden. BUT, Trump also lost 2,324 votes, that went nowhere.
SOURCES: Here is the data I used:
EDISON DATA: [links in original link]
The data is from Edison Research, it is used for election coverage by at least ABC News, CBS News, CNN and NBC News. It is also used for the website of the NYT, and probably others as well.
I scraped the data from the NYT website, here to check for other states, replace "pennsylvania" in the link with the state you want to check, for states that have spaces in their names, like new york, write new-york instead.
Take this picture for example.
It's like this:
Nr.187 : 2,984,468(Total votes) * 0.566(Trump share of the votes) = 1,689,208.888
Nr.188 : 2,984,522 * 0.56 = 1,671,332.32
Do the same thing for Biden, and you'll see that he gained the votes that Trump lost.
I made a program that basically checks every single change in votes, does the above to check if votes were switched, then adds them all up to get the total amount of switched votes.
Here is the link to a rar file containing all the .json files for the states, and the fraudcatch.py file, you'd need to download python 3.8.2 to use it, click EDIT with idle, then in the window that pops up click Run, to check how many votes were switched from Trump to Biden in a state, you then type findfraud('hawaii') for example, replace hawaii with the name of the file of the state you want to check, the file for new hampshire is named newhamp for example, so findfraud('newhamp'), to check the total lost votes (For both candidates) do lostvotes('newhamp') for example.
very interesting. keep digging.
First thing to note is that they should not be using percentages on the front (upstream) end. If they are (”they” being anybody but the final presenter of the data) then that screws up all sorts of calculations down the line. Let’s pretend they are not that stupid.
Second thing is .006 of 2,984,522 is 17,907 votes, way more than the new 54 votes that came in between posts. That right there is evidence of manipulation.
At post 187, Trump’s 56.6% of the votes cast is 1,689,209. At post 188, Trump’s 56.0% of the vote is 1,671,332. A difference of 17,877 votes. The difference between 17,907 and 17,877 is 30 - well inside that 54 vote update. Assume that Trump got 30 of the 52, Biden got 23, and someone else (that Libertarian, say) got 1, pretty much in line with the prior distribution, and the numbers match almost perfectly. In any case, the 54 votes come nowhere near the amount required to change the percentages like that.
But, somehow, 17,877 votes got transferred out of Trump’s total and into Biden’s. Somebody has some ‘splainin’ to do.
This is the same rounding con by Richard Pryor’s character in the Superman movie - who’s going to notice fractions of a penny, or fractions of a vote percent? At least until you pull up to the White House in your new Ferrari.
Pretty dumb and easy to spot.
221k were taken from Trump and given to Biden - 442k relative change.
The 941k “lost” votes simply disappeared from the system and it isn’t certain who they were cast for. It could have been for Trump, for Biden or for any combination of candidates.
Probably they were mostly Trump votes, but we won’t know until there is a recount.
Which browser are you using? It’s possible some browsers are blocking the site in true Lefty fashion.
Safari
The MIT PhD video numbers were much higher for Michigan switched votes than what is presented here. Dr. Shiva:
Another good one:
This guy and his team purchased several databases and their team is finding solid info.
https://mobile.twitter.com/mattbraynard/status/1325615367738232832?s=21
OK, thanks.
Apparently OK for Edge, too.
is there any way to establish how many lost votes were lost by trump and how many lost votes were lost by biden?
that’s pretty crucial. otherwise this data is not very good.
did the lost votes disappear from the biden count or the trump count.
This and so many other major actions suggest the Supreme court could require a do over of the elections with federal supervision. As we're learning many states broke their own laws regarding using ON LINE vote counting.
If they did this they would not make the dead line of January 21. Charles Grassley would become interim president until we could have another election like next October. Trump could be integrated on 2022 this would allow him 2-2/3 term presidency. As he didn't get a full term.
Another option they could do which is likely to take place find and do a patch job as most people are suggesting trying to save this obvious fraud election. I hope not no matter how they attempt to patch this one up the states would get away with criminal tampering of the elections
One of the comments there:
– donutboy 3 points 3 minutes ago +3 / -0
I modified the script slightly to give me the total amount of glitches, 129 in total.
Try explaining how a ‘glitch’ that occurs 129 times happens to ONLY move votes from Trump to Biden, and not the other way around?
analysis of vote total alterations, though surely some are just corrections or deletions of double-counts. That said, it looks like a ridiculously high number.
And it’s not only the presidental election that is involved, plenty of state positions such as state legislators and judges are elected and of course US Senators and Reps. Fraud has polluted our elections for decades and this time it’s like a nuclear explosion. It either gets rooted out and those responsible get charged with crimes or we have no country.
bookmark
I just tried and it’s ultra complex and made computer act funny.
Nothing to see here
Remember. Unity
Now fall in line
Why would a new election have to wait until October?
Regarding the author’s comment:
“and I found this damning evidence:”
and the link:
https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png
It’s a simple screenshot of two instances:
output row 187:
vote shares:
trumpd: 0.566
bidenj: 0.42
votes: 2984468
eevp: 42
eevp_source: “edison”
timestamp: “2020-11-04T04:07:43Z”
output row 188:
vote shares:
trumpd: 0.56
bidenj: 0.426
votes: 2984522
eevp: 42
eevp_source: “edison”
timestamp: “2020-11-04T04:08:51Z”
Trailing “Z” in the timestamp, indicates ZULU military time for the Prime Meridian (UTC).
-
That amounts to (per “PedeInspector”):
2,984,468 * 0.566 = 1,689,208 < Trump Before
2,984,522 * 0.56 = 1,671,332 < Trump After
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
