Posted on 11/06/2020 2:59:30 PM PST by TigerClaws
Scriberr News @ScriberrNews The election-software (Dominion Voting Systems) that has now been called into question in #AntrimCounty #Michigan is currently used in 27 other states as well as Puerto Rico, according to their website. #ElectionResults #ElectionResults2020 #ElectionNight
Iraq has a more reliable and functional voting system than the supposed bastion of democracy. Set up an electoral system like Australia and have confidence in your vote.
Whoa....sure looks like 5 states you show could flip the “thing” for Trump.
You know that John Solomon must be all over this.
Well that sure as heck explains why Trump beat Hillary by +5 in Georgia in 2016 and is losing to Biden now. It sure isn’t because the enthusiasm for Trump was less or enthusiasm for Biden was more.
Is this the hammer?
Thanks.
That one county had 19,000 votes.
6,000 switched.
So it’s wide open in all these states.
I’m a bit baffled as to just how 6k votes could be clicked for X and then Y gets the vote. What sort of glitch would cause this?
And - how was it discovered?
Chinese burning evidence a month or so ago.
Iran and ChiComms would be the most likely to hack.
They want Biden.
If it’s “unhacked” later they still did damage to our credibility and fostered division.
So it’s a win win for them.
FYI, since I see NYS on that map...
When I voted in person Tuesday morning, instead of signing in the book with a pen, I signed into some electric gizmatron.
And to write my signature, I was told to use the popsicle sticks they were handing out.
My signature was a mess.
I’m now wondering if that was the intended result.
I am concerned about that, too. Tx for posting your experience.
Their Software HQ is in Toronto, wasn’t the Obamacare website ‘created’ in Canada also?
————————
And all written by Unqualified H1B scum from India (who has a huge stake in the election. Hiden/Ho promises unlimited H1Bs and 10 million green cards for Indians immediately (watch him do it by executive order - if he manages to steal the election)
I read that to be in one county.
I’d think you could put in the program to change so many x votes to y over a certain time but I’m not sure. I’d think ta goodIT person/hacker could try to trace it l too
I don’t understand this type of thing well.
Is there any way that individual locations could change the software to make this “mistake”? i.e., cheat?
—
If it is like much packaged software, you don’t typically have access to the code base itself, but you configure it to do what you want.
Think of something like Microsoft Word or Excel. You don’t modify the code running Excel, but you can configure it as such to use a particular formula on a spreadsheet.
Voting software would let you configure ballot question text, yes/no answers to questions, etc. That would be the user modifiable configuration.
Now for what was reported to have happened, where effectively votes for one candidate were switched to another either...
a) the software is extremely buggy
b) the software has a really crappy interface which makes it non-obvious a mistake has been made in configuration
c) there is nefarious code in the software allowing for “backdoor” manipulation of the results
d) whoever configured the software deliberately misconfigured it to accumulate votes to a “chosen” candidate, regardless of which candidate the voter selects
Yes- one county. I’m just interested in how a computer program could make such an error.
But- good they found it, fixed it and informed voters. That’s how trust is built. A rare commodity.
Yep
Is it possible that some of the machines had the “feature” and were used in certain counties? There were counties in GA where Biden outperformed Clinton by an unbelievable margin -
A glitch being some sort of unforeseen error, this was absolutely not a glitch. This had to be purposely programmed into the code. This was not an accident.
See my post above. It’s a CIA hacking program. It occurs AFTER all human tabulations are done and the totals are transmitted to the final stop. That’s where the switch occurs. This explains why the clerks are finding it odd that the numbers aren’t matching. Of course if they cheat beyond recount territory it will never get caught.
Obviously, these machines were not rigorously tested as they should. Voting machines and ballots should be treated almost like nuclear launch codes, because the winner of a presidential election actually does control the nuclear launch codes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.