Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

We knew this crap would happen, they’ll be finding ballots into next year and I’ve been asking all month WHY the hell was this allowed?


2 posted on 11/05/2020 11:00:34 AM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (As long as Hillary Clinton remains free equal justice under the law will never exist in the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Im sure there is cheating going on but at the same time, these are government workers we’re talking about and no offense, but many are idiots do there is also a ton of incompetence.


8 posted on 11/05/2020 11:05:10 AM PST by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda
This strikes me as a de facto violation of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, and the 1982 Amendment to Section 2 - the major difference being disenfranchisement on the basis of party vs race. Work with me.

...several factors for courts to consider when determining if, within the totality of the circumstances in a jurisdiction, the operation of the electoral device being challenged results in a violation of Section 2. These factors include:

1. the history of official voting-related discrimination in the state or political subdivision;
2. the extent to which voting in the elections of the state or political subdivision is racially party polarized;
3. the extent to which the state of political subdivision has used voting practices or procedures that tend to enhance the opportunity for discrimination against the minority group, such as unusually large election districts, majority-vote requirements, and prohibitions against bullet voting;
4. the exclusion of members of the minority group from candidate slating processes;
5. the extent to which minority group members bear the effects of discrimination in areas such as education, employment, and health, which hinder their ability to participate effectively in the political process;
6. the use of overt or subtle racial appeals in political campaigns; and
7. the extent to which members of the minority group have been elected to public office in the jurisdiction.
S.Rep. No. 97-417, 97th Cong., 2d Sess. (1982), pages 28-29.

26 posted on 11/05/2020 11:17:01 AM PST by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

How bad and deeply corrupt are people?

Saw stacy abrams face on tv yesterday... you bet she is in this somehow.... she is trying to climb that ladder... she could lose some weight …


56 posted on 11/05/2020 12:59:53 PM PST by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda
We knew this crap would happen, they’ll be finding ballots into next year and I’ve been asking all month WHY the hell was this allowed?

I wish I knew why this was allowed to happen. Let me make a wild-aarse guess: I hope nobody bashes me for making this guess but I'm just throwing it out there as one (of many) possibilities:

Everyone's been criticizing SCOTUS Chief Justice John Roberts for voting with liberal Justices last month to allow Pennsylvania to conduct its planned election scam. But let's say Roberts instead voted with conservative Justices, preventing Pennsylvania from pulling its election scam. Maybe Roberts thought then you'll have Democrats across the country screaming that Trump and his Supreme Court is suppressing the vote (and thus automatically handing the election to Trump).

So instead, Roberts sides with liberal Justices, letting Pennsylvania pull its planned election scammery. Combine that with many other Democrat-controlled states' similar ongoing election scammery, and it makes it patently obvious to the world what desperate TDS-Democrats are doing. And maybe Roberts was also thinking Amy Coney Barrett will soon be confirmed so when Trump obviously brings the Democrats' election scammery to the SCOTUS, it can rule for Trump with an overwhelming 6-3 majority (which maybe the whole country will accept). Heck, after seeing the Democrats' Mass Election Scammery, maybe even one of the liberal Justices might (temporarily) switch sides, making it a 7-2 decision in favor of Trump. Nobody in their right mind could rationally fight against a 7-2 SCOTUS decision.

Just a thought that popped into my head. I admit I could be waaaaaaay off-base on this one.

58 posted on 11/05/2020 1:03:44 PM PST by gw-ington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson