Posted on 10/28/2020 5:16:25 AM PDT by EyesOfTX
The focus should be on ATT and Comcast — why are these two telecom operations suppressing the China Biden connection?
CNN is ATT
NBC/MSNBC are Comcast
Joe actually tried to call Adam. He ended up calling someone else and talking about Corn Pop and hair on his legs.
Schiff must be down and out and disappointed.....he's done all he could to protect the Democrats from Trump,
and when that didnt work......... he's now taken on the responsibility to protect the Bidens.
Yet not one Democrat has spoken up for what Schiff wants most of all.......a "spontaneous" demand that Schiff run for President.
I’m old enough to remember when Democrats used to brag how much they admired and supported whistleblowers...
They won’t do a damn thing, especially not report it. Jonathan Turley made the case this morning on Fox that they broke no laws, that the Congress critters passed laws to make it legal grifting (which is true) by allowing the relatives of our representatives to grift and then give the proceeds to the Representative. That is they way it has always been done in Washington D.C., and the reason that they all come in poor and go out filthy rich...MAKE TERM LIMITS and make the States pay for their own Senators and Congressmen.
The interview with Tucker was compelling and seemingly truthful and factual. However, this is going nowhere. Its too far over most people’s head. Most have no real concept of what the Biden’s were doing to actually break the law. Tell Americans “Russia!!!”.... and we reflexively believe “bad...evil....corrupt”... because of decades of indoctrination about evil Communist Russia. I just don’t see this moving the needle. Of course the lapdog media is doing their part.... and pretending like there’s nothing to see.
You must be older than a year then. They were all in for whistleblowers just a year ago.
Chuckle.
Schiff can’t retract his statement. That would be a public acknowledgement that he’s full of it. He had to double down on it.
Thank God he did.
L
Turley says they broke no laws, technically, but they were dealing with people who were state actors in some cases (the Chinese head of intelligence) or in others were people involved in the foreign policy of their states (Ukraine, Russia).
This is the aspect that is important and makes this more than just shady business practices.
Furthermore, bribery, graft and money laundering, all of which were occurring in these deals, are not legal, especially when they involve foreign parties.
The question is... do the remaining voters care about or even understand this as anything besides ops normal for politicians?
Bookmark
Don’t worry. This will all be investigated just like Hillary’s 33,000 classified emails on her private server. Be patient. The judicial process is slow when it comes to democrats. //sarc off//
I agree. Most voters don't have the critical thinking or energy needed to grasp why the Biden Crime Family's activities are nefarious.
Can you access this site? I’m having issues.
I watched the interview and found Bobulinski to be credible, with one exception. Bobulinkski recounted how Jim Biden used the term plausible deniability to describe how the deals would be kept from tarnishing Joe Biden if he ran for President. Bobulinski said to Tucker he knew the meaning of plausible deniability. Yet, even after hearing of this strategy from Jim Biden, Bobulinski asked no questions and continued to work on behalf of the Bidens. Why?
They can only be a time bomb if Barr was an attorney general who prosecuted democrats.
We all know Joe is a disposable wrapper in any scenario. It makes Kamala the president.
Plus the suburban women are too persuaded by the view.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.